Ad is loading...
MFCIX vs NAESX
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCIX vs NAESX
Meridian Contrarian Investor
Price$33.30
Change+$0.54 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.64M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$100.96
Change+$1.49 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. MFCIX (472M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCIX: NAESX (1.39) vs MFCIX (0.46). MFCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCIX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCIX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). MFCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCIX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.88 vs. MFCIX (-7.55). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.04 vs. MFCIX (25.19).
| MFCIX | NAESX | MFCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.471 | -13.542 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.39 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.55 | -3.88 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.24 | 3.78 | -482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.19 | 69.04 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.94 | 74.33 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...