MFG
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.71 (-14.31%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
49.2B
39 days until earnings call
ONB
Price
$17.97
Change
-$0.81 (-4.31%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.1B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MFG vs ONB

Header iconMFG vs ONB Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs ONBBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$4.25
Change-$0.71 (-14.31%)
Volume$8.86M
Capitalization49.2B
Old National Ban
Price$17.97
Change-$0.81 (-4.31%)
Volume$5.16M
Capitalization5.1B
MFG vs ONB Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. ONB commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and ONB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $4.96 vs. ONB: $18.78)
Brand notoriety: MFG and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 249% vs. ONB: 157%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $49.2B vs. ONB: $5.1B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.2B. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and ONB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than ONB.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -15.65% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was -12.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

ONB is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than ONB($5.1B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than ONB: MFG (11.31) vs ONB (8.58). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 1.431 vs. ONB (-12.931). ONB has less debt than MFG: ONB (5.05B) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than ONB: MFG (2.88T) vs ONB (1.84B).
MFGONBMFG / ONB
Capitalization49.2B5.1B965%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.431-12.931-11%
P/E Ratio11.318.58132%
Revenue2.88T1.84B156,863%
Total CashN/A431M-
Total Debt20.53T5.05B406,916%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
738
SMR RATING
1..100
110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCV10.940.34
+3.21%
INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST
USVN48.640.53
+1.10%
US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF
XHYF37.42N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF
GREK47.32-0.78
-1.62%
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
MDYV72.91-5.35
-6.84%
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-8.82%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
-7.25%
BKU - MFG
43%
Loosely correlated
-10.58%
PNFP - MFG
43%
Loosely correlated
-14.07%
FNB - MFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-11.43%
ONB - MFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-12.04%
More