MFG
Price
$5.60
Change
+$0.09 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.2B
33 days until earnings call
SNV
Price
$51.58
Change
+$1.24 (+2.46%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.74B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs SNV

Header iconMFG vs SNV Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs SNVBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$5.60
Change+$0.09 (+1.63%)
Volume$22.3K
Capitalization49.2B
Synovus Financial
Price$51.58
Change+$1.24 (+2.46%)
Volume$4.78K
Capitalization5.74B
MFG vs SNV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. SNV commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and SNV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $5.60 vs. SNV: $51.57)
Brand notoriety: MFG and SNV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 69% vs. SNV: 77%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $49.2B vs. SNV: $5.74B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.2B. SNV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNV is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than SNV.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while SNV (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SNV is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than SNV($5.74B). SNV (11.34) and MFG (11.31) have similar P/E ratio . MFG YTD gains are higher at: 14.519 vs. SNV (2.325). SNV has less debt than MFG: SNV (1.23B) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than SNV: MFG (2.88T) vs SNV (2.16B).
MFGSNVMFG / SNV
Capitalization49.2B5.74B857%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.5192.325625%
P/E Ratio11.3111.34100%
Revenue2.88T2.16B133,519%
Total CashN/A605M-
Total Debt20.53T1.23B1,665,288%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs SNV: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
SNV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
767
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1928
SMR RATING
1..100
110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6141
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.

SNV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SNV’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

SNV's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SNV’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGSNV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABF46.920.40
+0.87%
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF
XCEM34.120.26
+0.77%
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
VKI8.220.05
+0.61%
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II
SPTL26.480.13
+0.49%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
XFIV49.310.11
+0.22%
BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+1.63%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
HBAN - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
SNV - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
RF - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More

SNV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNV has been closely correlated with PNFP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNV jumps, then PNFP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNV
1D Price
Change %
SNV100%
+2.67%
PNFP - SNV
94%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
WTFC - SNV
93%
Closely correlated
+2.37%
FNB - SNV
93%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
ASB - SNV
92%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
ONB - SNV
92%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
More