MFG vs SNV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and SNV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNV’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SNV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.00% price change this week, while SNV (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
SNV is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.52% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| MFG | SNV | MFG / SNV | |
| Capitalization | 49.2B | 5.74B | 857% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.272 | -21.180 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.31 | 11.34 | 100% |
| Revenue | 2.88T | 2.16B | 133,519% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 605M | - |
| Total Debt | 20.53T | 1.23B | 1,665,288% |
MFG | SNV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MFG's Valuation (39) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNV (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNV’s over the last 12 months.
MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.
MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.
MFG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SNV (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SNV’s over the last 12 months.
SNV's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.
| MFG | SNV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 43% | 11 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 63% |
MFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFG | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| SUTNY - MFG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| NWG - MFG | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| HBAN - MFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| TFC - MFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| SNV - MFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||