MFGCF
Price
$1.24
Change
+$0.02 (+1.64%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
134.03M
TGLDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFGCF vs TGLDF

Header iconMFGCF vs TGLDF Comparison
Open Charts MFGCF vs TGLDFBanner chart's image
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.24
Change+$0.02 (+1.64%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization134.03M
RENEGADE GOLD
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization5.06M
MFGCF vs TGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFGCF vs. TGLDF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFGCF is a Hold and TGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MFGCF: $1.24 vs. TGLDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: MFGCF and TGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFGCF: 88% vs. TGLDF: 24%
Market capitalization -- MFGCF: $134.03M vs. TGLDF: $5.06M
MFGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $134.03M. TGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFGCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGLDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFGCF is a better buy in the short-term than TGLDF.

Price Growth

MFGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.47% price change this week, while TGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFGCF($134M) has a higher market cap than TGLDF($5.06M). MFGCF YTD gains are higher at: -3.516 vs. TGLDF (-14.611). TGLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.43M vs. MFGCF (-12.87M). MFGCF has more cash in the bank: 7.69M vs. TGLDF (370K). MFGCF (0) and TGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MFGCFTGLDFMFGCF / TGLDF
Capitalization134M5.06M2,650%
EBITDA-12.87M-6.43M200%
Gain YTD-3.516-14.61124%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.69M370K2,077%
Total DebtN/A268K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
TGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGCFTGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNLYF63.492.80
+4.62%
Unilever, PLC
PAFRF0.61N/A
N/A
Pan African Resources PLC
RATIY45.18N/A
N/A
Rational AG
NWCBF0.07N/A
N/A
NEW WORLD COBALT LTD.
STRPF0.24-0.01
-3.91%
Starr Peak Mining Ltd.

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and TGLDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and TGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
+1.23%
TGLDF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - MFGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
KLGDF - MFGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+11.41%
GRLGF - MFGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNLF - MFGCF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A

TGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGLDF and MFGCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGLDF and MFGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLDF
1D Price
Change %
TGLDF100%
N/A
MFGCF - TGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
HYMC - TGLDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
ARMN - TGLDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
TGMGF - TGLDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - TGLDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More