MFH
Price
$7.47
Change
+$0.19 (+2.61%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
74.42M
MNTR
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
504.71K
Ad is loading...

MFH vs MNTR

Header iconMFH vs MNTR Comparison
Open Charts MFH vs MNTRBanner chart's image
Mercurity Fintech Holding
Price$7.47
Change+$0.19 (+2.61%)
Volume$318.69K
Capitalization74.42M
Mentor Capital
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.41K
Capitalization504.71K
MFH vs MNTR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFH vs. MNTR commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFH is a Hold and MNTR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MFH: $7.47 vs. MNTR: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: MFH and MNTR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFH: 170% vs. MNTR: 21%
Market capitalization -- MFH: $74.42M vs. MNTR: $504.71K
MFH [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $74.42M. MNTR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $504.71K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNTR is a better buy in the long-term than MFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNTR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MNTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFH is a better buy in the short-term than MNTR.

Price Growth

MFH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +38.08% price change this week, while MNTR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFH is expected to report earnings on Dec 29, 2022.

MNTR is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFH($74.4M) has a higher market cap than MNTR($505K). MFH YTD gains are higher at: 9.370 vs. MNTR (-12.401). MNTR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 135K vs. MFH (-10.38M). MNTR has more cash in the bank: 863K vs. MFH (441K). MNTR has less debt than MFH: MNTR (1.71M) vs MFH (7.28M). MNTR has higher revenues than MFH: MNTR (8.03M) vs MFH (670K).
MFHMNTRMFH / MNTR
Capitalization74.4M505K14,733%
EBITDA-10.38M135K-7,692%
Gain YTD9.370-12.401-76%
P/E RatioN/A11.74-
Revenue670K8.03M8%
Total Cash441K863K51%
Total Debt7.28M1.71M425%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFH vs MNTR: Fundamental Ratings
MFH
MNTR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
9912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFH's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (100). This means that MFH’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

MFH's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNTR (100). This means that MFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

MNTR's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFH (99). This means that MNTR’s stock grew significantly faster than MFH’s over the last 12 months.

MFH's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (39). This means that MFH’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

MNTR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFH (100). This means that MNTR’s stock grew significantly faster than MFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFHMNTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLACX15.460.14
+0.91%
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Y
HGIFX53.630.47
+0.88%
Hartford Core Equity F
GTSRX25.600.16
+0.63%
Invesco Small Cap Growth R
MIOLX25.940.06
+0.23%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp L
TGREX11.760.02
+0.17%
TCW Global Real Estate I

MFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFH and BTCS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFH and BTCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFH
1D Price
Change %
MFH100%
+2.61%
BTCS - MFH
29%
Poorly correlated
+33.21%
CLSK - MFH
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
RJF - MFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BTBT - MFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
JEF - MFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More

MNTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTR and MNXBF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTR and MNXBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTR
1D Price
Change %
MNTR100%
-1.08%
MNXBF - MNTR
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERNXY - MNTR
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - MNTR
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
SLNH - MNTR
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
MFH - MNTR
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
More