MFIC
Price
$11.71
Change
-$0.09 (-0.76%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.09B
31 days until earnings call
WHF
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.02 (+0.29%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
162.47M
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFIC vs WHF

Header iconMFIC vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts MFIC vs WHFBanner chart's image
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$11.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.76%)
Volume$3.95K
Capitalization1.09B
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$7.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.91K
Capitalization162.47M
MFIC vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFIC vs. WHF commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFIC is a Buy and WHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MFIC: $11.71 vs. WHF: $6.99)
Brand notoriety: MFIC and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFIC: 141% vs. WHF: 150%
Market capitalization -- MFIC: $1.09B vs. WHF: $162.47M
MFIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.09B. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $162.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $182.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFIC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the long-term than WHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

MFIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

WHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.15% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFIC($1.09B) has a higher market cap than WHF($162M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than MFIC: WHF (43.69) vs MFIC (11.15). MFIC YTD gains are higher at: -5.143 vs. WHF (-18.232). WHF has less debt than MFIC: WHF (363M) vs MFIC (2.05B). MFIC has higher revenues than WHF: MFIC (109M) vs WHF (9.51M).
MFICWHFMFIC / WHF
Capitalization1.09B162M675%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.143-18.23228%
P/E Ratio11.1543.6926%
Revenue109M9.51M1,146%
Total Cash16.5MN/A-
Total Debt2.05B363M565%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIC vs WHF: Fundamental Ratings
MFIC
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2368
SMR RATING
1..100
3282
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6088
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
164
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFIC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (4). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (68). This means that MFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (82). This means that MFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (88). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MFIC (16). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to MFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFICWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSMZX10.800.05
+0.47%
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Z
PXEAX26.220.10
+0.38%
Impax Global Environmental Markets A
MFRBX54.10N/A
N/A
MFS Research B
NBNGX26.49N/A
N/A
Sit Mid Cap Growth
ZSCIX33.74N/A
N/A
Zacks Small-Cap Core Institutional

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
+0.14%
BCSF - WHF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
OBDC - WHF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
PSEC - WHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLRC - WHF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
MFIC - WHF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
More