Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFJBX vs RFUTX
MFJBX vs RFUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFJBX vs. RFUTX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFJBX is a Hold and RFUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFUTX has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. MFJBX (256M). MFJBX pays higher dividends than RFUTX: MFJBX (1.69) vs RFUTX (1.00). MFJBX was incepted earlier than RFUTX: MFJBX (9 years) vs RFUTX (11 years). MFJBX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RFUTX (0.39). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RFUTX (5.00). RFUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJBX: RFUTX (250) vs MFJBX (1000). RFUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. MFJBX (8.45). RFUTX (50.45) and MFJBX (48.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFJBX | RFUTX | MFJBX / RFUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.39 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.39 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.457 | 18.628 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 18.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.00 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 14.25 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.28 | 60.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.89 | 50.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 120.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers