Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFJBX vs RFUTX
MFJBX vs RFUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFJBX vs. RFUTX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFJBX is a Hold and RFUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFUTX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. MFJBX (251M). MFJBX pays higher dividends than RFUTX: MFJBX (1.69) vs RFUTX (0.98). MFJBX was incepted earlier than RFUTX: MFJBX (9 years) vs RFUTX (11 years). MFJBX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RFUTX (0.39). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RFUTX (5.00). RFUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJBX: RFUTX (250) vs MFJBX (1000). RFUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. MFJBX (6.92). RFUTX (39.25) and MFJBX (38.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFJBX | RFUTX | MFJBX / RFUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.39 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.39 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.556 | 14.891 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 18B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.98 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 12.14 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.56 | 46.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.90 | 39.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement