Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$26.08
Change+$0.21 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.88M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. MFLDX (89.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (1.07) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. NLSAX (9.42). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.60 vs. NLSAX (23.49).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.68 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.68 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.332 | 6.338 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.9M | 7.54B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 9.42 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.55 | 19.25 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.60 | 23.49 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.56 | 55.94 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement