Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$24.25
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.28M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.41B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.41B vs. MFLDX (88.3M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (1.16) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. NLSAX (8.37). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.85 vs. NLSAX (27.62).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.68 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.68 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.297 | 3.792 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.3M | 7.41B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 8.37 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.80 | 15.01 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.85 | 27.62 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.57 | 45.09 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers