Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$23.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.86M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.85
Change+$0.11 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. MFLDX (87.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (2.23) vs NLSAX (0.30). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. MFLDX (30.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. MFLDX (4.57). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. NLSAX (28.99).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.304 | 1.517 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 7.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.30 | 747% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 7.33 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.73 | 11.29 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 28.99 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.61 | 42.89 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...