Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$23.23
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. MFLDX (96M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (2.23) vs NLSCX (0.03). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (17 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. MFLDX (30.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. MFLDX (6.47). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.70 vs. NLSCX (19.49).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.495 | 4.567 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96M | 7.17B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.03 | 7,284% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.47 | 8.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 1.00 | 1,468% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 19.49 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.41 | 28.67 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers