Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$23.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.86M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.03
Change+$0.11 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. MFLDX (87.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (2.23) vs NLSCX (0.03). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. MFLDX (30.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. MFLDX (4.57). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. NLSCX (23.91).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.304 | 1.300 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 7.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.03 | 7,284% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 6.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.73 | 8.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 23.91 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.61 | 32.20 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers