Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$22.36
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.23M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.78
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.22B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.22B vs. MFLDX (83.2M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (1.22) vs NLSCX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than MFLDX (1.95). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MFLDX (30.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. MFLDX (-1.81). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. NLSCX (25.11).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 2.43 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.43 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.909 | 0.509 | -572% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.2M | 7.22B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.81 | 5.64 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 10.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 25.11 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.69 | 29.23 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers