Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$24.25
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.65M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. MFLDX (87.7M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (1.16) vs NLSCX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than MFLDX (2.09). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. NLSCX (7.23). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.70 vs. NLSCX (22.24).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.472 | 3.109 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.7M | 7.39B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 7.23 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 11.91 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.70 | 22.24 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.34 | 33.82 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement