Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$26.47
Change-$0.23 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.79M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.00
Change-$0.10 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.05B vs. MFLDX (89.8M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.70 vs. NLSIX (8.50). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.82 vs. NLSIX (22.88).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 7.200 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.8M | 8.05B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.02 | 5,040% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.70 | 8.50 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.94 | 22.29 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.82 | 22.88 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.52 | 62.15 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement