Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$23.66
Change-$0.25 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.89M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.33
Change-$0.10 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. MFLDX (87.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.23) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.33 vs. MFLDX (6.34). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.97 vs. NLSIX (33.19).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.821 | 3.627 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 7.39B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.02 | 5,659% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 8.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.75 | 19.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.97 | 33.19 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.36 | 49.40 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers