Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$22.55
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.4M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.23B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.23B vs. MFLDX (83.4M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.22) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MFLDX (1.95) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. MFLDX (-0.59). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. NLSIX (32.80).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.32 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.32 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.475 | 0.960 | -258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 7.23B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.02 | 5,550% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.59 | 7.95 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.10 | 13.61 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.57 | 32.80 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.82 | 45.44 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers