Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$24.09
Change-$0.29 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.87M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.25
Change-$0.13 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. MFLDX (86.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.16) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. NLSIX (8.29). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 53.10 vs. NLSIX (30.99).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.862 | 3.360 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.9M | 7.32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.02 | 5,455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 8.29 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.44 | 20.65 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.10 | 30.99 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.59 | 49.46 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers