Ad is loading...
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$23.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.86M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.15
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. MFLDX (87.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (2.23) vs NLSIX (0.63). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. MFLDX (30.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. MFLDX (4.57). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. NLSIX (31.42).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.304 | 1.493 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 7.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.63 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 7.66 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.73 | 12.55 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 31.42 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.61 | 48.23 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers