Ad is loading...
MFNLX vs RTEAX
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts MFNLX vs RTEAX
BlackRock National Municipal Inv C
Price$10.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.93B
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNLX vs. RTEAX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNLX is a Sell and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFNLX has more cash in the bank: 7.21B vs. RTEAX (5.93B). RTEAX pays higher dividends than MFNLX: RTEAX (3.19) vs MFNLX (2.47). MFNLX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: MFNLX (18 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). MFNLX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). MFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFNLX: RTEAX (0) vs MFNLX (1000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.28 vs. MFNLX (1.10). RTEAX (-3.36) and MFNLX (-3.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFNLX | RTEAX | MFNLX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.80 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.82 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.430 | 1.094 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.21B | 5.93B | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 3.19 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 2.28 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.44 | 1.53 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.49 | -3.36 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.25 | 1.63 | 506% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers