Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFNLX vs RTEAX
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts MFNLX vs RTEAX
BlackRock National Municipal Inv C
Price$10.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.93B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$22.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.18B
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNLX vs. RTEAX commentary
Oct 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNLX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX (6.18B) and MFNLX (5.93B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RTEAX pays higher dividends than MFNLX: RTEAX (3.31) vs MFNLX (2.70). MFNLX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: MFNLX (19 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). MFNLX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). MFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFNLX: RTEAX (0) vs MFNLX (1000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. MFNLX (1.94). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.89 vs. MFNLX (-0.74).
| MFNLX | RTEAX | MFNLX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.80 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.82 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.706 | 3.691 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.93B | 6.18B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | 3.75 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 15.36 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.74 | 1.89 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.23 | 4.02 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement