Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFNLX vs RTEAX
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts MFNLX vs RTEAX
BlackRock National Municipal Inv C
Price$9.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNLX vs. RTEAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNLX is a Sell and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFNLX (6.06B) and RTEAX (5.86B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RTEAX pays higher dividends than MFNLX: RTEAX (3.34) vs MFNLX (2.63). MFNLX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: MFNLX (19 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). MFNLX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). MFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFNLX: RTEAX (0) vs MFNLX (1000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.99 vs. MFNLX (-0.74). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.18 vs. MFNLX (-3.19).
| MFNLX | RTEAX | MFNLX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.80 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.82 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.481 | -0.115 | 1,286% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 5.86B | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.74 | 0.99 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.84 | 7.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.19 | -1.18 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.37 | 1.29 | 571% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers