Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFNLX vs RTEAX
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts MFNLX vs RTEAX
BlackRock National Municipal Inv C
Price$9.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.02B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.52
Change-$0.07 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92B
MFNLX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNLX vs. RTEAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNLX is a Sell and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFNLX (6.02B) and RTEAX (5.92B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RTEAX pays higher dividends than MFNLX: RTEAX (3.33) vs MFNLX (2.65). MFNLX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: MFNLX (19 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). MFNLX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). MFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFNLX: RTEAX (0) vs MFNLX (1000). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.03 vs. MFNLX (-0.81). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.62 vs. MFNLX (-4.00).
| MFNLX | RTEAX | MFNLX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.80 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.82 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.244 | 0.375 | -332% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.02B | 5.92B | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.81 | 1.03 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.72 | 5.69 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.00 | -1.62 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.62 | 1.74 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement