MGDDF
Price
$32.25
Change
-$2.20 (-6.39%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
MGDDY
Price
$16.32
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MGDDF vs MGDDY

Header iconMGDDF vs MGDDY Comparison
Open Charts MGDDF vs MGDDYBanner chart's image
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$32.25
Change-$2.20 (-6.39%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$16.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Volume$266.23K
CapitalizationN/A
MGDDF vs MGDDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGDDF vs. MGDDY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To understand the difference between Michelin (CGDE)-B - Registered Shares (MGDDF) vs. Michelin (CGDE)-B - ADR (MGDDY) it is enough to know the definitions of Registered Shares and ADR

Registered Shares - Registered shares are issued in the name of the exact shareholder and include his address and details recorded in the company's shareholder register. If the owner decides to sell shares, they must be re-registered under the name and address of the new owner. Shareholders receive dividends as well as other corporate communications directly from the company or its transfer agent.

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MGDDF: $32.25 vs. MGDDY: $16.33)
Brand notoriety: MGDDF and MGDDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGDDF: 73% vs. MGDDY: 174%
Market capitalization -- MGDDF: $20.17B vs. MGDDY: $23.43B
MGDDF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $20.17B. MGDDY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $23.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGDDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGDDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDY is a better buy in the long-term than MGDDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGDDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGDDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MGDDF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while MGDDY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGDDY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.98% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDY($23.4B) has a higher market cap than MGDDF($20.2B). MGDDF has higher P/E ratio than MGDDY: MGDDF (11.03) vs MGDDY (8.90). MGDDY YTD gains are higher at: -5.689 vs. MGDDF (-8.588). MGDDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.41B vs. MGDDF (4.4B). MGDDF has more cash in the bank: 4.21B vs. MGDDY (3.42B). MGDDF (7.84B) and MGDDY (7.95B) have identical debt. MGDDY has higher revenues than MGDDF: MGDDY (29.4B) vs MGDDF (22.3B).
MGDDFMGDDYMGDDF / MGDDY
Capitalization20.2B23.4B86%
EBITDA4.4B5.41B81%
Gain YTD-8.588-5.689151%
P/E Ratio11.038.90124%
Revenue22.3B29.4B76%
Total Cash4.21B3.42B123%
Total Debt7.84B7.95B99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGDDF vs MGDDY: Fundamental Ratings
MGDDF
MGDDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9360
SMR RATING
1..100
9292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5043

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (8). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGDDF (93). This means that MGDDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (92). This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (63). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (77). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGDDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWJDX30.56N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps R4
MBERX32.47-0.15
-0.46%
NYLI Balanced Class R6
MSBPX8.55-0.05
-0.58%
Morgan Stanley Global Focus Rl Est R6
SHXYX14.67-0.11
-0.74%
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps Y
PMFSX26.78-0.25
-0.92%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R4

MGDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGDDF and MGDDY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGDDF and MGDDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDF
1D Price
Change %
MGDDF100%
-6.39%
MGDDY - MGDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
KNBHF - MGDDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRETF - MGDDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
KOTMF - MGDDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBUMY - MGDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGDDY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGDDY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDY
1D Price
Change %
MGDDY100%
+0.15%
VLEEY - MGDDY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
LEA - MGDDY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
CTTAY - MGDDY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
MGA - MGDDY
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ADNT - MGDDY
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
More