MGDDF
Price
$36.60
Change
-$1.95 (-5.06%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
20.17B
MNTHF
Price
$2.00
Change
+$0.05 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGDDF vs MNTHF

Header iconMGDDF vs MNTHF Comparison
Open Charts MGDDF vs MNTHFBanner chart's image
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$36.60
Change-$1.95 (-5.06%)
Volume$500
Capitalization20.17B
Minth Group
Price$2.00
Change+$0.05 (+2.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.7B
MGDDF vs MNTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGDDF vs. MNTHF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGDDF is a Hold and MNTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MGDDF: $36.60 vs. MNTHF: $2.00)
Brand notoriety: MGDDF and MNTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGDDF: 24% vs. MNTHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MGDDF: $20.17B vs. MNTHF: $3.7B
MGDDF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $20.17B. MNTHF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGDDF and MNTHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGDDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGDDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MGDDF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while MNTHF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.54% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDF($20.2B) has a higher market cap than MNTHF($3.7B). MNTHF has higher P/E ratio than MGDDF: MNTHF (14.62) vs MGDDF (11.03). MGDDF YTD gains are higher at: 8.477 vs. MNTHF (2.828). MGDDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.4B vs. MNTHF (1.82B). MNTHF has more cash in the bank: 4.64B vs. MGDDF (4.21B). MNTHF has less debt than MGDDF: MNTHF (7.44B) vs MGDDF (7.84B). MGDDF has higher revenues than MNTHF: MGDDF (22.3B) vs MNTHF (14.5B).
MGDDFMNTHFMGDDF / MNTHF
Capitalization20.2B3.7B546%
EBITDA4.4B1.82B241%
Gain YTD8.4772.828300%
P/E Ratio11.0314.6275%
Revenue22.3B14.5B154%
Total Cash4.21B4.64B91%
Total Debt7.84B7.44B105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGDDF vs MNTHF: Fundamental Ratings
MGDDF
MNTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5142
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
9376
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (12). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (100). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (93). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (57). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (68). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGDDFMNTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALICE.X0.4107290.046721
+12.84%
MyNeighborAlice cryptocurrency
METIS.X15.9567520.885274
+5.87%
Metis cryptocurrency
ANT.X0.0652780.000585
+0.90%
Autonomi cryptocurrency
PRG30.550.22
+0.73%
PROG Holdings
VOYA72.690.18
+0.25%
Voya Financial

MGDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGDDF and MGDDY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGDDF and MGDDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDF
1D Price
Change %
MGDDF100%
N/A
MGDDY - MGDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
KNBHF - MGDDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRETF - MGDDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
KOTMF - MGDDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBUMY - MGDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTHF and MRETF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTHF and MRETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTHF
1D Price
Change %
MNTHF100%
N/A
MRETF - MNTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
LIMAF - MNTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
MGDDF - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGDDY - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
MBUMY - MNTHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More