MGDDF
Price
$33.82
Change
+$3.98 (+13.34%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
22.6B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MNTHF
Price
$4.40
Change
-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.77B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGDDF vs MNTHF

Header iconMGDDF vs MNTHF Comparison
Open Charts MGDDF vs MNTHFBanner chart's image
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$33.82
Change+$3.98 (+13.34%)
Volume$2.26K
Capitalization22.6B
Minth Group
Price$4.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Volume$980
Capitalization4.77B
MGDDF vs MNTHF Comparison Chart in %
MGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGDDF vs. MNTHF commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGDDF is a StrongBuy and MNTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MGDDF: $33.82 vs. MNTHF: $4.40)
Brand notoriety: MGDDF and MNTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGDDF: 188% vs. MNTHF: 157%
Market capitalization -- MGDDF: $22.6B vs. MNTHF: $4.77B
MGDDF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $22.6B. MNTHF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $4.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $82.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGDDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGDDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNTHF is a better buy in the long-term than MGDDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGDDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNTHF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGDDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNTHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDF is a better buy in the short-term than MNTHF.

Price Growth

MGDDF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while MNTHF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.77% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDF($22.6B) has a higher market cap than MNTHF($4.77B). MNTHF has higher P/E ratio than MGDDF: MNTHF (14.22) vs MGDDF (13.31). MNTHF YTD gains are higher at: 126.221 vs. MGDDF (0.249).
MGDDFMNTHFMGDDF / MNTHF
Capitalization22.6B4.77B474%
EBITDA4.53BN/A-
Gain YTD0.249126.2210%
P/E Ratio13.3114.2294%
Revenue26.7BN/A-
Total Cash3.52BN/A-
Total Debt7.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGDDF vs MNTHF: Fundamental Ratings
MGDDF
MNTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9260
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (35). This means that MGDDF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (92). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (100). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (63). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDF (32). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to MGDDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGDDFMNTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEORX18.910.21
+1.12%
Hartford Climate Opportunities R3
UGMVX12.440.06
+0.48%
Victory Global Managed Volatility
ASVDX10.070.04
+0.40%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
REREX64.080.20
+0.31%
American Funds EUPAC R4
HSTAX93.280.16
+0.17%
Hartford Stock HLS IA

MGDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGDDF and MGDDY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGDDF and MGDDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDF
1D Price
Change %
MGDDF100%
N/A
MGDDY - MGDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
KNBHF - MGDDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRETF - MGDDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
KOTMF - MGDDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBUMY - MGDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTHF and MRETF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTHF and MRETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTHF
1D Price
Change %
MNTHF100%
N/A
MRETF - MNTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
LIMAF - MNTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGDDF - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGDDY - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
MBUMY - MNTHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More