Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFLX vs NPFFX
MGFLX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFLX vs NPFFX
MGFLX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFLX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFLX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFLX (139M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MGFLX (0.00). MGFLX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MGFLX (22 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MGFLX (24.00) and NPFFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFFX: MGFLX (0) vs NPFFX (250). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.39 vs. MGFLX (-20.10). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.32 vs. MGFLX (-55.99).
| MGFLX | NPFFX | MGFLX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.77 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.77 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.378 | 4.744 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.10 | 7.39 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.12 | 36.58 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.99 | 13.32 | -420% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.95 | 113.07 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement