Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFLX vs RNPFX
MGFLX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFLX vs RNPFX
MGFLX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 83B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 136.53M to 165.87B. RNPFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 165.87B. The lowest valued company is MGFLX at 136.53M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 11%. RNPFX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while MGFLX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
MGFLX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFLX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. MGFLX (137M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: RNPFX (1.18) vs MGFLX (0.00). MGFLX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MGFLX (22 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). MGFLX (24.00) and RNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: MGFLX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. MGFLX (-20.65). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. MGFLX (-58.80).
| MGFLX | RNPFX | MGFLX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.45 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.45 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.762 | 7.684 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137M | 166B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.65 | 7.45 | -277% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.42 | 41.65 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.80 | 11.98 | -491% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.31 | 109.32 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers