MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.74M
MGPUF
Price
$3.84
Change
+$0.19 (+5.21%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHCF vs MGPUF

Header iconMGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.81K
Capitalization1.74M
M&G
Price$3.84
Change+$0.19 (+5.21%)
Volume$261
Capitalization8.61B
MGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. MGPUF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a StrongBuy and MGPUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. MGPUF: $3.84)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and MGPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 362% vs. MGPUF: 4%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $1.74M vs. MGPUF: $8.61B
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.74M. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGPUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than MGPUF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.70% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was +7.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPUF($8.61B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($1.74M). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 52.988 vs. MGHCF (9.705).
MGHCFMGPUFMGHCF / MGPUF
Capitalization1.74M8.61B0%
EBITDA221KN/A-
Gain YTD9.70552.98818%
P/E RatioN/A31.78-
Revenue-398.63KN/A-
Total Cash5.34MN/A-
Total Debt136KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF vs MGPUF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
MGPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
8511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPUF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (92). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (100). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (85). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (45). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPUF (11). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFMGPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAFM24.760.02
+0.08%
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
MMLG34.760.01
+0.03%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
MMJJF0.03N/A
N/A
HYGROVEST LTD.
FEBP30.23-0.06
-0.19%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Feb
EUSA101.11-0.21
-0.21%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
N/A
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-28.14%
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
N/A
SRXXF - MGPUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
QUILF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGPF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
More