Ad is loading...
MGHCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
MGPUF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MGHCF vs MGPUF

Header iconMGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.4K
CapitalizationN/A
M&G
Price$2.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.14K
CapitalizationN/A
MGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. MGPUF commentary
Nov 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and MGPUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.05 vs. MGPUF: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and MGPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 294% vs. MGPUF: 131%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.35M vs. MGPUF: $6.09B
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.35M. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +66.11% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPUF($6.09B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.35M). MGHCF YTD gains are higher at: 24.969 vs. MGPUF (-7.776). MGPUF has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. MGHCF (6.38M). MGHCF has less debt than MGPUF: MGHCF (206K) vs MGPUF (7.96B). MGHCF has higher revenues than MGPUF: MGHCF (282K) vs MGPUF (-8.72B).
MGHCFMGPUFMGHCF / MGPUF
Capitalization2.35M6.09B0%
EBITDA-2.71MN/A-
Gain YTD24.969-7.776-321%
P/E RatioN/A71.94-
Revenue282K-8.72B-0%
Total Cash6.38M4.88B0%
Total Debt206K7.96B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAEIX12.89-0.07
-0.54%
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Advisor
RPTTX50.18-0.52
-1.03%
T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Gr I
EVTMX17.06-0.19
-1.10%
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder A
JHSOX27.48-0.57
-2.03%
JHancock New Opportunities I
LYFIX13.22-0.30
-2.22%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare I

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
+2.82%
SRXXF - MGPUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
QUILF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-11.05%
PGPHF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
MNGPF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More