MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
MGPUF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.12 (-4.58%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

MGHCF vs MGPUF

Header iconMGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$35K
CapitalizationN/A
M&G
Price$2.50
Change-$0.12 (-4.58%)
Volume$5.41K
CapitalizationN/A
MGHCF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. MGPUF commentary
Jan 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and MGPUF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. MGPUF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and MGPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 167% vs. MGPUF: 20%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.35M vs. MGPUF: $6.09B
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.35M. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGPUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the short-term than MGHCF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.08% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.38% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPUF($6.09B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.35M). MGHCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MGPUF (-0.398). MGPUF has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. MGHCF (6.38M). MGHCF has less debt than MGPUF: MGHCF (206K) vs MGPUF (7.96B). MGHCF has higher revenues than MGPUF: MGHCF (282K) vs MGPUF (-8.72B).
MGHCFMGPUFMGHCF / MGPUF
Capitalization2.35M6.09B0%
EBITDA-2.71MN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-0.398-
P/E RatioN/A71.94-
Revenue282K-8.72B-0%
Total Cash6.38M4.88B0%
Total Debt206K7.96B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFMGPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFMIX39.150.73
+1.90%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
WTSGX21.520.39
+1.85%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
FGSAX59.071.06
+1.83%
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
LYFCX12.440.11
+0.89%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare C
MRSAX22.340.01
+0.04%
MFS Research International A

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
N/A
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-13.42%
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
More

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
-4.58%
SRXXF - MGPUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
QUILF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
MNGPF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More