MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.35M
MNGPF
Price
$2.40
Change
+$0.05 (+2.13%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHCF vs MNGPF

Header iconMGHCF vs MNGPF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs MNGPFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$15.78K
Capitalization2.35M
Man Group
Price$2.40
Change+$0.05 (+2.13%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization3.94B
MGHCF vs MNGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. MNGPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and MNGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. MNGPF: $2.40)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and MNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 282% vs. MNGPF: 147%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.35M vs. MNGPF: $3.94B
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.35M. MNGPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNGPF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNGPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MNGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than MNGPF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.73% price change this week, while MNGPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGHCF is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNGPF($3.94B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.35M). MGHCF YTD gains are higher at: 9.705 vs. MNGPF (-4.369). MNGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 377M vs. MGHCF (-2.71M). MNGPF has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. MGHCF (6.38M). MGHCF has less debt than MNGPF: MGHCF (206K) vs MNGPF (423M). MNGPF has higher revenues than MGHCF: MNGPF (1.17B) vs MGHCF (282K).
MGHCFMNGPFMGHCF / MNGPF
Capitalization2.35M3.94B0%
EBITDA-2.71M377M-1%
Gain YTD9.705-4.369-222%
P/E RatioN/A15.88-
Revenue282K1.17B0%
Total Cash6.38M180M4%
Total Debt206K423M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF vs MNGPF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
MNGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
8657
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
292
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNGPF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (86). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (100). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (86). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (58). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNGPF (92). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFMNGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CABA1.630.03
+1.87%
Cabaletta Bio
RNG29.870.40
+1.36%
RINGCENTRAL
CHCT17.500.19
+1.10%
Community Healthcare Trust
WDC66.080.30
+0.46%
Western Digital Corp
XFOR1.89-0.09
-4.55%
X4 Pharmaceuticals Inc

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
+35.42%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
More

MNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGPF and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGPF and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGPF
1D Price
Change %
MNGPF100%
N/A
CG - MNGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
MGPUF - MNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
LGGNY - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
PGPHF - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
MGHCF - MNGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+35.42%
More