MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
ONEXF
Price
$84.76
Change
-$0.87 (-1.02%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.95B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHCF vs ONEXF

Header iconMGHCF vs ONEXF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs ONEXFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.92K
Capitalization2.05M
Onex
Price$84.76
Change-$0.87 (-1.02%)
Volume$641
Capitalization5.95B
MGHCF vs ONEXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. ONEXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and ONEXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. ONEXF: $84.76)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and ONEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 318% vs. ONEXF: 19%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.05M vs. ONEXF: $5.95B
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.05M. ONEXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileONEXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ONEXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONEXF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONEXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ONEXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than ONEXF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +17.25% price change this week, while ONEXF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONEXF($5.95B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.05M). ONEXF has higher P/E ratio than MGHCF: ONEXF (11.91) vs MGHCF (5.82). MGHCF YTD gains are higher at: 18.706 vs. ONEXF (7.782). ONEXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 491M vs. MGHCF (221K). ONEXF has more cash in the bank: 569M vs. MGHCF (5.34M). MGHCF has less debt than ONEXF: MGHCF (136K) vs ONEXF (4.63B). ONEXF has higher revenues than MGHCF: ONEXF (761M) vs MGHCF (-398.63K).
MGHCFONEXFMGHCF / ONEXF
Capitalization2.05M5.95B0%
EBITDA221K491M0%
Gain YTD18.7067.782240%
P/E Ratio5.8211.9149%
Revenue-398.63K761M-0%
Total Cash5.34M569M1%
Total Debt136K4.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF vs ONEXF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
ONEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
8884
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONEXF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (92). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (100). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (88). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (47). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (50). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFONEXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAFGX85.950.89
+1.05%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
CAMIX30.92N/A
N/A
Cambiar International Equity Inv
IUASX31.74N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Equity and Income S
LAMQX25.05N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
NSIDX14.80N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Index

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
-3.83%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ONEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONEXF and CIXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONEXF and CIXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEXF
1D Price
Change %
ONEXF100%
N/A
CIXXF - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLK - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
JHG - ONEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
BN - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
BAM - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More