MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.35M
PNXPF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHCF vs PNXPF

Header iconMGHCF vs PNXPF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs PNXPFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$15.78K
Capitalization2.35M
Planet Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization4.17M
MGHCF vs PNXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. PNXPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and PNXPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. PNXPF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and PNXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 282% vs. PNXPF: 179%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.35M vs. PNXPF: $4.17M
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.35M. PNXPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNXPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNXPF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNXPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PNXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than PNXPF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.73% price change this week, while PNXPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGHCF is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNXPF($4.17M) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.35M). PNXPF YTD gains are higher at: 119.417 vs. MGHCF (9.705). PNXPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.94M vs. MGHCF (-2.71M). MGHCF has more cash in the bank: 6.38M vs. PNXPF (5.13M). MGHCF has less debt than PNXPF: MGHCF (206K) vs PNXPF (327K). MGHCF has higher revenues than PNXPF: MGHCF (282K) vs PNXPF (-1.84M).
MGHCFPNXPFMGHCF / PNXPF
Capitalization2.35M4.17M56%
EBITDA-2.71M-1.94M140%
Gain YTD9.705119.4178%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue282K-1.84M-15%
Total Cash6.38M5.13M124%
Total Debt206K327K63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF vs PNXPF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
PNXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8617
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNXPF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (86). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (100). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (86). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (41). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXPF (34). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFPNXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENGN3.800.06
+1.60%
enGene Holdings
ITGR121.00-0.19
-0.16%
Integer Holdings Corp
ABEV2.47-0.02
-0.80%
Ambev SA
RCUS8.47-0.12
-1.40%
Arcus Biosciences
PSHG1.68-0.04
-2.33%
Performance Shipping

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
+35.42%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
More

PNXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXPF and HFAHF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXPF and HFAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXPF
1D Price
Change %
PNXPF100%
N/A
HFAHF - PNXPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - PNXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGHCF - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+35.42%
PIAC - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More