MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
PNXPF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHCF vs PNXPF

Header iconMGHCF vs PNXPF Comparison
Open Charts MGHCF vs PNXPFBanner chart's image
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.92K
Capitalization2.05M
Planet Ventures
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization8.14M
MGHCF vs PNXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHCF vs. PNXPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHCF is a Hold and PNXPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHCF: $0.04 vs. PNXPF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: MGHCF and PNXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHCF: 318% vs. PNXPF: 7%
Market capitalization -- MGHCF: $2.05M vs. PNXPF: $8.14M
MGHCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.05M. PNXPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNXPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGHCF and PNXPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNXPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PNXPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than PNXPF.

Price Growth

MGHCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +17.25% price change this week, while PNXPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNXPF($8.14M) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.05M). MGHCF has higher P/E ratio than PNXPF: MGHCF (5.82) vs PNXPF (1.77). PNXPF YTD gains are higher at: 63.309 vs. MGHCF (18.706). PNXPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.61M vs. MGHCF (221K). PNXPF has more cash in the bank: 13.9M vs. MGHCF (5.34M). MGHCF has less debt than PNXPF: MGHCF (136K) vs PNXPF (192K). PNXPF has higher revenues than MGHCF: PNXPF (928K) vs MGHCF (-398.63K).
MGHCFPNXPFMGHCF / PNXPF
Capitalization2.05M8.14M25%
EBITDA221K6.61M3%
Gain YTD18.70663.30930%
P/E Ratio5.821.77329%
Revenue-398.63K928K-43%
Total Cash5.34M13.9M38%
Total Debt136K192K71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHCF vs PNXPF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHCF
PNXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8751
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5079
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNXPF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (92). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (100). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (88). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (39). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXPF (79). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHCFPNXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RH235.2414.02
+6.34%
RH
IRMD72.141.54
+2.18%
iRadimed Corp
XYZ75.75-0.04
-0.05%
Block Inc
MASS5.50-0.02
-0.36%
908 Devices
HBIO0.47-0.01
-1.29%
Harvard Bioscience

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
-3.83%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXPF and HFAHF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXPF and HFAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXPF
1D Price
Change %
PNXPF100%
-4.75%
HFAHF - PNXPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - PNXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGHCF - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
PIAC - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+20.00%
PGPHF - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More