MGHL
Price
$1.48
Change
+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
888.13K
NPPTF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.01 (-1.27%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
102.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGHL vs NPPTF

Header iconMGHL vs NPPTF Comparison
Open Charts MGHL vs NPPTFBanner chart's image
Morgan Group Holding
Price$1.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Volume$4.08K
Capitalization888.13K
Neptune Digital Assets
Price$0.78
Change-$0.01 (-1.27%)
Volume$194.76K
Capitalization102.89M
MGHL vs NPPTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGHL vs. NPPTF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGHL is a Hold and NPPTF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MGHL: $1.48 vs. NPPTF: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: MGHL and NPPTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGHL: 314% vs. NPPTF: 79%
Market capitalization -- MGHL: $888.13K vs. NPPTF: $102.89M
MGHL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $888.13K. NPPTF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $102.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPPTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGHL and NPPTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHL’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPPTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGHL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NPPTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPPTF is a better buy in the short-term than MGHL.

Price Growth

MGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while NPPTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.07% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPPTF($103M) has a higher market cap than MGHL($888K). NPPTF YTD gains are higher at: 9.754 vs. MGHL (-9.756). MGHL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -931.49K vs. NPPTF (-2.12M). NPPTF has more cash in the bank: 10.3M vs. MGHL (216K). NPPTF has less debt than MGHL: NPPTF (7.47M) vs MGHL (7.99M). MGHL has higher revenues than NPPTF: MGHL (2.07M) vs NPPTF (1.84M).
MGHLNPPTFMGHL / NPPTF
Capitalization888K103M1%
EBITDA-931.49K-2.12M44%
Gain YTD-9.7569.754-100%
P/E RatioN/A49.35-
Revenue2.07M1.84M112%
Total Cash216K10.3M2%
Total Debt7.99M7.47M107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGHL vs NPPTF: Fundamental Ratings
MGHL
NPPTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
453
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGHL's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPTF (91). This means that MGHL’s stock grew similarly to NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

NPPTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHL (100). This means that NPPTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHL’s over the last 12 months.

NPPTF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHL (100). This means that NPPTF’s stock grew similarly to MGHL’s over the last 12 months.

MGHL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPTF (43). This means that MGHL’s stock grew similarly to NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPTF (100). This means that MGHL’s stock grew similarly to NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGHLNPPTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VWAGY11.990.10
+0.84%
Volkswagen AG
AABB0.02N/A
+0.28%
Asia Broadband, Inc.
MDRSF66.68N/A
N/A
MEDARTIS HOLDING AG
AKBLF28.95N/A
N/A
Alk Abello AS
FRFLF0.25-0.01
-4.98%
FRNT Financial Inc.

MGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHL and MAUSY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHL and MAUSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHL
1D Price
Change %
MGHL100%
N/A
MAUSY - MGHL
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQBKY - MGHL
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
OTCM - MGHL
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
NPPTF - MGHL
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
LDNXF - MGHL
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More

NPPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPPTF has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPPTF jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPTF
1D Price
Change %
NPPTF100%
-1.73%
DMGGF - NPPTF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
HUT - NPPTF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
OPY - NPPTF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
BTBT - NPPTF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
BITF - NPPTF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More