Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGIBX vs RERBX
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MGIBX vs RERBX
MFS International Intrinsic Value B
Price$42.51
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.58B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.67
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGIBX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGIBX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. MGIBX (24.6B). MGIBX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MGIBX (0.48) vs RERBX (0.24). MGIBX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MGIBX (30 years) vs RERBX (23 years). MGIBX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MGIBX (13.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGIBX: RERBX (250) vs MGIBX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. MGIBX (8.34). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. MGIBX (-9.60).
| MGIBX | RERBX | MGIBX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.56 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.558 | 21.278 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.6B | 139B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.24 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 9.79 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.72 | 47.22 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.60 | 10.91 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.43 | 37.13 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement