Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGIBX vs RERBX
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MGIBX vs RERBX
MFS International Intrinsic Value B
Price$41.12
Change-$0.46 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.81B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$60.12
Change-$0.82 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.2B
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGIBX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGIBX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. MGIBX (23.8B). MGIBX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MGIBX (0.48) vs RERBX (0.23). MGIBX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MGIBX (30 years) vs RERBX (23 years). MGIBX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MGIBX (13.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGIBX: RERBX (250) vs MGIBX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. MGIBX (10.06). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.64 vs. MGIBX (-15.81).
| MGIBX | RERBX | MGIBX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.56 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.56 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.531 | 18.230 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 134B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.23 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 12.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.96 | 28.83 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.81 | 0.64 | -2,488% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.45 | 32.65 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement