Advertisement
MGIH vs SCBGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGIH is a Hold and SCBGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MGIH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MGIH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCBGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MGIH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MGIH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SCBGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
MGIH (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.04%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (-1.54% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| MGIH | SCBGF | MGIH / SCBGF | |
| Capitalization | 16.8M | 4.1B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 803M | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.325 | -48.858 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.38 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 3.33B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 240M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.69B | - |
| MGIH | SCBGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 23 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
MGIH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MGIH and ORBS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGIH and ORBS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGIH | 100% | -9.70% | ||
| ORBS - MGIH | 26% Poorly correlated | +15.70% | ||
| OI - MGIH | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BALL - MGIH | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| REYN - MGIH | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| AVY - MGIH | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
SCBGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and ORBS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and ORBS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCBGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCBGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ORBS - SCBGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +15.70% | ||
| NEXNF - SCBGF | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.01% | ||
| ORRAF - SCBGF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MGIH - SCBGF | -1% Poorly correlated | -9.70% | ||
| AMBP - SCBGF | -3% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
More | ||||