Ad is loading...
MGLBX vs NPFFX
MGLBX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MGLBX vs NPFFX
Marsico Global
Price$24.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.48M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$58.07
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.19B
MGLBX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLBX vs. NPFFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLBX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. MGLBX (336M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: NPFFX (0.53) vs MGLBX (0.00). MGLBX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MGLBX (18 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: NPFFX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. NPFFX (1.05). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.45 vs. NPFFX (39.85).
| MGLBX | NPFFX | MGLBX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.78 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.78 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.887 | -5.731 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 1.05 | 938% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.59 | 3.84 | 1,031% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.45 | 39.85 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.33 | 53.29 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...