MGMLF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
44.78M
MMTMF
Price
$0.36
Change
+$0.01 (+2.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
128.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGMLF vs MMTMF

Header iconMGMLF vs MMTMF Comparison
Open Charts MGMLF vs MMTMFBanner chart's image
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.11
Change+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Volume$748.48K
Capitalization44.78M
Monument Mining
Price$0.36
Change+$0.01 (+2.86%)
Volume$12.8K
Capitalization128.82M
MGMLF vs MMTMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGMLF vs. MMTMF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGMLF is a Buy and MMTMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MGMLF: $0.11 vs. MMTMF: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: MGMLF and MMTMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGMLF: 254% vs. MMTMF: 80%
Market capitalization -- MGMLF: $46.27M vs. MMTMF: $123.58M
MGMLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $46.27M. MMTMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $123.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMTMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the long-term than MGMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGMLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMTMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMTMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the short-term than MGMLF.

Price Growth

MGMLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +38.06% price change this week, while MMTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.22% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMTMF($129M) has a higher market cap than MGMLF($44.8M). MGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 181.660 vs. MMTMF (94.141). MMTMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.6M vs. MGMLF (-5.4M). MMTMF has more cash in the bank: 29.2M vs. MGMLF (5.41M). MMTMF has less debt than MGMLF: MMTMF (115K) vs MGMLF (263K). MMTMF has higher revenues than MGMLF: MMTMF (77.6M) vs MGMLF (0).
MGMLFMMTMFMGMLF / MMTMF
Capitalization44.8M129M35%
EBITDA-5.4M42.6M-13%
Gain YTD181.66094.141193%
P/E RatioN/A5.55-
Revenue077.6M-
Total Cash5.41M29.2M19%
Total Debt263K115K229%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGMLF vs MMTMF: Fundamental Ratings
MGMLF
MMTMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGMLF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MMTMF (88). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGMLF (100). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (36). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGMLFMMTMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARWYF0.07N/A
+5.71%
ARWAY CORP.
ESKYF0.250.01
+4.56%
Eskay Mining Corp
UMICF15.750.15
+0.94%
Umicore SA
ALPMF11.48N/A
N/A
Astellas Pharma, Inc.
DYNDF7.35N/A
N/A
DYE & DURHAM LTD.

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
+22.33%
GSISF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
GGLDF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
WRLGF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
DTARF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMTMF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMTMF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
+3.21%
AUGO - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
PZG - MMTMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
MNDJF - MMTMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMLF - MMTMF
0%
Poorly correlated
+22.33%
MMRGF - MMTMF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
More