MGPHF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
23.98M
MIDLF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.02 (-8.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPHF vs MIDLF

Header iconMGPHF vs MIDLF Comparison
Open Charts MGPHF vs MIDLFBanner chart's image
Mason Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.66K
Capitalization23.98M
Midland Expl
Price$0.23
Change-$0.02 (-8.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization22.7M
MGPHF vs MIDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPHF vs. MIDLF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPHF is a StrongBuy and MIDLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPHF: $0.05 vs. MIDLF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: MGPHF and MIDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPHF: 36% vs. MIDLF: 4%
Market capitalization -- MGPHF: $23.98M vs. MIDLF: $22.7M
MGPHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.98M. MIDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $22.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMIDLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MIDLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the long-term than MIDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MIDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the short-term than MIDLF.

Price Growth

MGPHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.72% price change this week, while MIDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGPHF is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPHF($24M) has a higher market cap than MIDLF($22.7M). MGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 16.584 vs. MIDLF (12.967). MIDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. MGPHF (-3.96M). MGPHF has more cash in the bank: 8.22M vs. MIDLF (6.32M). MIDLF has less debt than MGPHF: MIDLF (42.8K) vs MGPHF (3.88M). MIDLF has higher revenues than MGPHF: MIDLF (329K) vs MGPHF (0).
MGPHFMIDLFMGPHF / MIDLF
Capitalization24M22.7M106%
EBITDA-3.96M-1.69M234%
Gain YTD16.58412.967128%
P/E Ratio8.82N/A-
Revenue0329K-
Total Cash8.22M6.32M130%
Total Debt3.88M42.8K9,068%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPHF vs MIDLF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPHF
MIDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2578
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPHF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (65). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (100). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MIDLF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (93). This means that MIDLF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (54). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIDLF (100). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPHFMIDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHVTF3.35N/A
N/A
Select Harvests Ltd.
BLIDF31.07N/A
N/A
Boliden AB
IWTNF10.50N/A
N/A
IWATANI CORP.
FSXLF0.29-0.01
-4.32%
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD CORP.
LKREF5.38-0.33
-5.70%
Link Real Estate Investment Trust

MGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPHF and NMG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPHF and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPHF
1D Price
Change %
MGPHF100%
N/A
NMG - MGPHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
SHTLF - MGPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
RSNUF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRGF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - MGPHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MIDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIDLF and MACQF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIDLF and MACQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIDLF
1D Price
Change %
MIDLF100%
N/A
MACQF - MIDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - MIDLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRY - MIDLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
MKRIF - MIDLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
MGPHF - MIDLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More