MGPHF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
23.98M
SHTLF
Price
$1.90
Change
+$0.01 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPHF vs SHTLF

Header iconMGPHF vs SHTLF Comparison
Open Charts MGPHF vs SHTLFBanner chart's image
Mason Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.66K
Capitalization23.98M
South32
Price$1.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.53%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization11.81B
MGPHF vs SHTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPHF vs. SHTLF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPHF is a StrongBuy and SHTLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPHF: $0.05 vs. SHTLF: $1.90)
Brand notoriety: MGPHF and SHTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPHF: 36% vs. SHTLF: 80%
Market capitalization -- MGPHF: $23.98M vs. SHTLF: $11.81B
MGPHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.98M. SHTLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the long-term than SHTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHTLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHTLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the short-term than SHTLF.

Price Growth

MGPHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.72% price change this week, while SHTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGPHF is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHTLF($11.8B) has a higher market cap than MGPHF($24M). MGPHF has higher P/E ratio than SHTLF: MGPHF (8.82) vs SHTLF (5.00). MGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 16.584 vs. SHTLF (-11.015). SHTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. MGPHF (-3.96M). SHTLF has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. MGPHF (8.22M). MGPHF has less debt than SHTLF: MGPHF (3.88M) vs SHTLF (1.86B). SHTLF has higher revenues than MGPHF: SHTLF (8.96B) vs MGPHF (0).
MGPHFSHTLFMGPHF / SHTLF
Capitalization24M11.8B0%
EBITDA-3.96M3.94B-0%
Gain YTD16.584-11.015-151%
P/E Ratio8.825.00176%
Revenue08.96B-
Total Cash8.22M1.56B1%
Total Debt3.88M1.86B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPHF vs SHTLF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPHF
SHTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2541
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
9386
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPHF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHTLF (92). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHTLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (100). This means that SHTLF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTLF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (93). This means that SHTLF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SHTLF (59). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to SHTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHTLF (97). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPHFSHTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCCI6.270.07
+1.05%
OFS Credit Company
SHYG42.970.05
+0.12%
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corp Bd ETF
RMIF24.950.02
+0.08%
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
KNOV25.82N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Nov
ILTB49.06-0.14
-0.28%
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF

MGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPHF and NMG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPHF and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPHF
1D Price
Change %
MGPHF100%
N/A
NMG - MGPHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
SHTLF - MGPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
RSNUF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRGF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - MGPHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More