MGPPF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
TALK
Price
$2.63
Change
-$0.04 (-1.50%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
596.23M
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MGPPF vs TALK

Header iconMGPPF vs TALK Comparison
Open Charts MGPPF vs TALKBanner chart's image
Megaport
Price$7.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Volume$120
Capitalization1.1B
Talkspace
Price$2.63
Change-$0.04 (-1.50%)
Volume$2.82M
Capitalization596.23M
MGPPF vs TALK Comparison Chart
Loading...
TALK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPPF vs. TALK commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPPF is a Hold and TALK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPPF: $7.00 vs. TALK: $2.63)
Brand notoriety: MGPPF and TALK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPPF: 69% vs. TALK: 114%
Market capitalization -- MGPPF: $1.1B vs. TALK: $596.23M
MGPPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.1B. TALK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $596.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTALK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TALK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPPF is a better buy in the long-term than TALK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TALK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TALK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MGPPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TALK (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

TALK is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.54% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPPF($1.1B) has a higher market cap than TALK($596M). MGPPF YTD gains are higher at: 52.599 vs. TALK (-14.887). MGPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88M vs. TALK (-22.01M). TALK has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. MGPPF (82.5M). TALK has higher revenues than MGPPF: TALK (150M) vs MGPPF (106M).
MGPPFTALKMGPPF / TALK
Capitalization1.1B596M185%
EBITDA1.88M-22.01M-9%
Gain YTD52.599-14.887-353%
P/E RatioN/A0.65-
Revenue106M150M71%
Total Cash82.5M124M67%
Total Debt27.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPPF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TALK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TALK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEQIX35.17N/A
N/A
Johnson Equity Income
IEMJX9.42N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq C
RLSIX12.91N/A
N/A
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
FIOOX16.02N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index
LAVTX14.66N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R5

MGPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGPPF has been loosely correlated with CMPVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGPPF jumps, then CMPVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPPF
1D Price
Change %
MGPPF100%
N/A
CMPVF - MGPPF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMPUY - MGPPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TALK - MGPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
QTWO - MGPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.99%
NCNO - MGPPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More

TALK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TALK has been loosely correlated with TDOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TALK jumps, then TDOC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TALK
1D Price
Change %
TALK100%
-1.68%
TDOC - TALK
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
ONTF - TALK
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
PRO - TALK
41%
Loosely correlated
-7.95%
AFRM - TALK
40%
Loosely correlated
-8.12%
DOCN - TALK
39%
Loosely correlated
-8.26%
More