MGPUF
Price
$3.70
Change
+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
QUILF
Price
$2.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPUF vs QUILF

Header iconMGPUF vs QUILF Comparison
Open Charts MGPUF vs QUILFBanner chart's image
M&G
Price$3.70
Change+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Volume$495
Capitalization8.3B
Quilter
Price$2.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.45%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization2.89B
MGPUF vs QUILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPUF vs. QUILF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPUF is a Hold and QUILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPUF: $3.70 vs. QUILF: $2.20)
Brand notoriety: MGPUF and QUILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPUF: 8% vs. QUILF: 234%
Market capitalization -- MGPUF: $8.3B vs. QUILF: $2.89B
MGPUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.3B. QUILF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQUILF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QUILF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than QUILF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUILF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QUILF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QUILF is a better buy in the short-term than MGPUF.

Price Growth

MGPUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUILF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPUF($8.3B) has a higher market cap than QUILF($2.89B). QUILF has higher P/E ratio than MGPUF: QUILF (40.06) vs MGPUF (31.78). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 47.251 vs. QUILF (20.846).
MGPUFQUILFMGPUF / QUILF
Capitalization8.3B2.89B287%
EBITDAN/A79M-
Gain YTD47.25120.846227%
P/E Ratio31.7840.0679%
RevenueN/A4.6B-
Total CashN/A66.3B-
Total DebtN/A274M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPUF vs QUILF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPUF
QUILF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5080
SMR RATING
1..100
1192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPUF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as QUILF (17). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QUILF (80). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUILF (92). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew significantly faster than QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPUF (44). This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as QUILF (32). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPUFQUILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLTW23.020.26
+1.14%
iShares 20+ Year Trs Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
OARK8.470.06
+0.71%
YieldMax ARKK Option Income Strategy ETF
BUYO26.37N/A
N/A
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF
XSHQ44.17-0.13
-0.30%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
MVAL34.42-0.12
-0.35%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
N/A
SRXXF - MGPUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
QUILF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
MNGPF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

QUILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUILF has been loosely correlated with KRMCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUILF jumps, then KRMCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUILF
1D Price
Change %
QUILF100%
N/A
KRMCF - QUILF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LGGNY - QUILF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
RHCO - QUILF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
SOLCF - QUILF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
PGPHF - QUILF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
More