MGPUF
Price
$3.33
Change
-$0.33 (-9.02%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.07B
SRXXF
Price
$9.90
Change
+$1.20 (+13.79%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
429.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPUF vs SRXXF

Header iconMGPUF vs SRXXF Comparison
Open Charts MGPUF vs SRXXFBanner chart's image
M&G
Price$3.33
Change-$0.33 (-9.02%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization8.07B
SPARX Asset Management
Price$9.90
Change+$1.20 (+13.79%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization429.91M
MGPUF vs SRXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPUF vs. SRXXF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPUF is a Hold and SRXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPUF: $3.33 vs. SRXXF: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: MGPUF and SRXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPUF: 72% vs. SRXXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MGPUF: $8.07B vs. SRXXF: $429.91M
MGPUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.07B. SRXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $429.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SRXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRXXF is a better buy in the long-term than MGPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MGPUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while SRXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGPUF($8.07B) has a higher market cap than SRXXF($430M). MGPUF has higher P/E ratio than SRXXF: MGPUF (31.78) vs SRXXF (10.96). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 32.669 vs. SRXXF (13.793). SRXXF has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. MGPUF (5.28B). MGPUF has less debt than SRXXF: MGPUF (6.76B) vs SRXXF (9B). SRXXF has higher revenues than MGPUF: SRXXF (17.3B) vs MGPUF (15.2B).
MGPUFSRXXFMGPUF / SRXXF
Capitalization8.07B430M1,876%
EBITDAN/A8.55B-
Gain YTD32.66913.793237%
P/E Ratio31.7810.96290%
Revenue15.2B17.3B88%
Total Cash5.28B16.5B32%
Total Debt6.76B9B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPUF vs SRXXF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPUF
SRXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5997
SMR RATING
1..100
9743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1455

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPUF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SRXXF (14). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to SRXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRXXF (97). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SRXXF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGPUF (97). This means that SRXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

SRXXF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPUF (56). This means that SRXXF’s stock grew similarly to MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SRXXF (28). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to SRXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPUFSRXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TUSI25.450.01
+0.04%
Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF
NBTR51.43N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
AJAN27.45-0.01
-0.04%
Innovator Equity DefinedPrtETF-2YTJa2026
SPBU27.41-0.11
-0.39%
AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allc ETF
ILCB91.36-0.47
-0.51%
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
N/A
SRXXF - MGPUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
QUILF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
MNGPF - MGPUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRXXF and MGPUF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRXXF and MGPUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRXXF
1D Price
Change %
SRXXF100%
N/A
MGPUF - SRXXF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - SRXXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.45%
PAX - SRXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
TRIN - SRXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
VINP - SRXXF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More