MGROF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.66M
NUFMF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.10 (-6.25%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
588.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGROF vs NUFMF

Header iconMGROF vs NUFMF Comparison
Open Charts MGROF vs NUFMFBanner chart's image
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization28.66M
NuFarm
Price$1.50
Change-$0.10 (-6.25%)
Volume$500
Capitalization588.78M
MGROF vs NUFMF Comparison Chart in %
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGROF vs. NUFMF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGROF is a StrongBuy and NUFMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MGROF: $0.48 vs. NUFMF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: MGROF and NUFMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGROF: 100% vs. NUFMF: 13%
Market capitalization -- MGROF: $28.66M vs. NUFMF: $588.78M
MGROF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $28.66M. NUFMF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $588.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $43.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNUFMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NUFMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NUFMF is a better buy in the long-term than MGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGROF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUFMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGROF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NUFMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGROF is a better buy in the short-term than NUFMF.

Price Growth

MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +11.56% price change this week, while NUFMF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +5.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+5.84% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUFMF($589M) has a higher market cap than MGROF($28.7M). NUFMF YTD gains are higher at: -35.000 vs. MGROF (-48.087). NUFMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 271M vs. MGROF (-5.75M). NUFMF has more cash in the bank: 464M vs. MGROF (1.82M). MGROF has less debt than NUFMF: MGROF (3.14M) vs NUFMF (1.1B). NUFMF has higher revenues than MGROF: NUFMF (3.4B) vs MGROF (7.03M).
MGROFNUFMFMGROF / NUFMF
Capitalization28.7M589M5%
EBITDA-5.75M271M-2%
Gain YTD-48.087-35.000137%
P/E RatioN/A103.60-
Revenue7.03M3.4B0%
Total Cash1.82M464M0%
Total Debt3.14M1.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGROF vs NUFMF: Fundamental Ratings
MGROF
NUFMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8489
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NUFMF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (92). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

MGROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (100). This means that MGROF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (100). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

MGROF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (89). This means that MGROF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGROF (100). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGROFNUFMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKVEX17.290.17
+0.99%
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
CSGEX15.430.08
+0.52%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr Inv A
DTSGX18.170.06
+0.33%
Wilshire Small Company Growth Invmt
DIFHX12.550.01
+0.08%
MFS Diversified Income R6
TNXIX21.39-0.08
-0.37%
1290 Avantis U.S. Large Cap Growth I

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGROF and VRDR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGROF and VRDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
N/A
VRDR - MGROF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
PUBC - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
NUFMF - MGROF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NUFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUFMF and SEED have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUFMF and SEED's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUFMF
1D Price
Change %
NUFMF100%
N/A
SEED - NUFMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.92%
VRDR - NUFMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
MGROF - NUFMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PUBC - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More