MHGU
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
76.49M
33 days until earnings call
RTBRF
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
210.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHGU vs RTBRF

Header iconMHGU vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts MHGU vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
Meritage Hospitality Group
Price$11.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$273
Capitalization76.49M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.49
Change-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Volume$913
Capitalization210.53M
MHGU vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MHGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHGU vs. RTBRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHGU is a Hold and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MHGU: $11.50 vs. RTBRF: $1.49)
Brand notoriety: MHGU and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHGU: 39% vs. RTBRF: 31%
Market capitalization -- MHGU: $76.49M vs. RTBRF: $210.53M
MHGU [@Restaurants] is valued at $76.49M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $210.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHGU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MHGU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the long-term than MHGU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHGU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHGU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MHGU is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

MHGU (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MHGU is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($211M) has a higher market cap than MHGU($76.5M). MHGU has higher P/E ratio than RTBRF: MHGU (17.99) vs RTBRF (12.23). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: -5.096 vs. MHGU (-17.857). RTBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157M vs. MHGU (24.8M). RTBRF has higher revenues than MHGU: RTBRF (1.37B) vs MHGU (652M).
MHGURTBRFMHGU / RTBRF
Capitalization76.5M211M36%
EBITDA24.8M157M16%
Gain YTD-17.857-5.096350%
P/E Ratio17.9912.23147%
Revenue652M1.37B48%
Total Cash17.6MN/A-
Total Debt584MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MHGU vs RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
MHGU
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7898
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTBRF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHGU (56). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHGU’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MHGU (100). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to MHGU’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MHGU (92). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to MHGU’s over the last 12 months.

MHGU's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (83). This means that MHGU’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

MHGU's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (59). This means that MHGU’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHGURTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITGSX77.84N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Growth Equity S
FSCPX70.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
HLQVX21.33N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value I
MGPSX79.80N/A
N/A
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
CREEX9.70N/A
N/A
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst

MHGU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHGU and NROM have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHGU and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHGU
1D Price
Change %
MHGU100%
N/A
NROM - MHGU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - MHGU
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - MHGU
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
SGLOF - MHGU
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - MHGU
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More