MHSDF
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.41B
TOEAF
Price
$21.61
Change
+$1.36 (+6.72%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.16B
Ad is loading...

MHSDF vs TOEAF

Header iconMHSDF vs TOEAF Comparison
Open Charts MHSDF vs TOEAFBanner chart's image
Megacable Holdings SAB DE CV
Price$2.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.41B
Toei Animation
Price$21.61
Change+$1.36 (+6.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.16B
MHSDF vs TOEAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHSDF vs. TOEAF commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHSDF is a Hold and TOEAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MHSDF: $2.13 vs. TOEAF: $21.61)
Brand notoriety: MHSDF and TOEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHSDF: 27% vs. TOEAF: 9%
Market capitalization -- MHSDF: $6.41B vs. TOEAF: $4.16B
MHSDF [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $6.41B. TOEAF’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $4.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $262.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOEAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MHSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TOEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHSDF is a better buy in the long-term than TOEAF.

Price Growth

MHSDF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TOEAF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +6.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (+0.77% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MHSDF($6.42B) has a higher market cap than TOEAF($4.16B). TOEAF has higher P/E ratio than MHSDF: TOEAF (37.04) vs MHSDF (24.63). MHSDF YTD gains are higher at: 26.786 vs. TOEAF (20.333). TOEAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.7B vs. MHSDF (7.41B). TOEAF has more cash in the bank: 62.5B vs. MHSDF (1.65B). TOEAF has higher revenues than MHSDF: TOEAF (69.7B) vs MHSDF (27.7B).
MHSDFTOEAFMHSDF / TOEAF
Capitalization6.42B4.16B154%
EBITDA7.41B23.7B31%
Gain YTD26.78620.333132%
P/E Ratio24.6337.0467%
Revenue27.7B69.7B40%
Total Cash1.65B62.5B3%
Total Debt4.28BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MHSDF: Fundamental Ratings
MHSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEYX16.00N/A
N/A
AB Global Core Equity Advisor
GSYPX34.28N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
MSTSX10.02N/A
N/A
Morningstar Global Opportunistic Equity
SCREX33.27N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Rl Estt R6
MIEKX34.02N/A
N/A
MFS International Equity I

MHSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHSDF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHSDF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHSDF
1D Price
Change %
MHSDF100%
N/A
MCOIF - MHSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QYOUF - MHSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THBRF - MHSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
UMGP - MHSDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-57.27%
VIVHY - MHSDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More

TOEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TOEAF and THBRF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOEAF and THBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOEAF
1D Price
Change %
TOEAF100%
N/A
THBRF - TOEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NENTF - TOEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMGP - TOEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-57.27%
MHSDF - TOEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOFV - TOEAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More