MHUBF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.91M
OMCL
Price
$29.25
Change
-$0.69 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHUBF vs OMCL

Header iconMHUBF vs OMCL Comparison
Open Charts MHUBF vs OMCLBanner chart's image
MINEHUB TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.34
Change+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization27.91M
Omnicell
Price$29.25
Change-$0.69 (-2.30%)
Volume$487.12K
Capitalization1.31B
MHUBF vs OMCL Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHUBF vs. OMCL commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHUBF is a Hold and OMCL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MHUBF: $0.34 vs. OMCL: $29.25)
Brand notoriety: MHUBF and OMCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHUBF: 2% vs. OMCL: 69%
Market capitalization -- MHUBF: $27.91M vs. OMCL: $1.31B
MHUBF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $27.91M. OMCL’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHUBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MHUBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHUBF is a better buy in the long-term than OMCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMCL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OMCL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MHUBF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.33% price change this week, while OMCL (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMCL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMCL($1.32B) has a higher market cap than MHUBF($27.9M). MHUBF YTD gains are higher at: 57.103 vs. OMCL (-34.299). OMCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.7M vs. MHUBF (-8.19M). OMCL has more cash in the bank: 480M vs. MHUBF (897K). MHUBF has less debt than OMCL: MHUBF (776K) vs OMCL (614M). OMCL has higher revenues than MHUBF: OMCL (1.15B) vs MHUBF (528K).
MHUBFOMCLMHUBF / OMCL
Capitalization27.9M1.32B2%
EBITDA-8.19M60.7M-13%
Gain YTD57.103-34.299-166%
P/E RatioN/A476.19-
Revenue528K1.15B0%
Total Cash897K480M0%
Total Debt776K614M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMCL: Fundamental Ratings
OMCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PADEX21.47-0.22
-1.01%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
MGZZX18.94-0.22
-1.15%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Insgt R6
FKGRX137.86-2.04
-1.46%
Franklin Growth A
WBSNX26.46-0.40
-1.49%
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
SAUMX28.30-0.49
-1.70%
SA US Small Company

MHUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and PHUN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and PHUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHUBF
1D Price
Change %
MHUBF100%
+5.82%
PHUN - MHUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
INTZ - MHUBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
OMCL - MHUBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
BKKT - MHUBF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.23%
KCRD - MHUBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More

OMCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMCL has been loosely correlated with FFIV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMCL jumps, then FFIV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMCL
1D Price
Change %
OMCL100%
-2.30%
FFIV - OMCL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
RIOT - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
CLSK - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.22%
COIN - OMCL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CWAN - OMCL
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
More