MHUBF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
44.51M
OMCL
Price
$31.50
Change
+$1.25 (+4.13%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.39B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHUBF vs OMCL

Header iconMHUBF vs OMCL Comparison
Open Charts MHUBF vs OMCLBanner chart's image
MINEHUB TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.49
Change-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Volume$53.75K
Capitalization44.51M
Omnicell
Price$31.50
Change+$1.25 (+4.13%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.39B
MHUBF vs OMCL Comparison Chart in %
MHUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHUBF vs. OMCL commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHUBF is a Hold and OMCL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MHUBF: $0.49 vs. OMCL: $30.25)
Brand notoriety: MHUBF and OMCL are both not notable
MHUBF represents the Packaged Software, while OMCL is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHUBF: 43% vs. OMCL: 50%
Market capitalization -- MHUBF: $44.51M vs. OMCL: $1.39B
MHUBF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $44.51M. OMCL’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $315.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $50.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHUBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MHUBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHUBF is a better buy in the long-term than OMCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHUBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMCL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHUBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MHUBF is a better buy in the short-term than OMCL.

Price Growth

MHUBF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while OMCL (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMCL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.80% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (+3.95% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMCL($1.39B) has a higher market cap than MHUBF($44.5M). MHUBF YTD gains are higher at: 126.852 vs. OMCL (-32.053). OMCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. MHUBF (-6.59M). OMCL has more cash in the bank: 412M vs. MHUBF (1.73M). MHUBF has less debt than OMCL: MHUBF (1.41M) vs OMCL (384M). OMCL has higher revenues than MHUBF: OMCL (1.15B) vs MHUBF (1.61M).
MHUBFOMCLMHUBF / OMCL
Capitalization44.5M1.39B3%
EBITDA-6.59M103M-6%
Gain YTD126.852-32.053-396%
P/E RatioN/A60.50-
Revenue1.61M1.15B0%
Total Cash1.73M412M0%
Total Debt1.41M384M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMCL: Fundamental Ratings
OMCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHUBFOMCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNGRY35.020.65
+1.89%
NN Group NV
EBYH0.16N/A
N/A
E-Buy Home Inc.
JGHAF33.84N/A
N/A
Jungheinrich AG
NXFNF3.65N/A
N/A
NEXT 15 GROUP PLC
PEBC63.00-2.00
-3.08%
Peoples Bancorp Inc.

MHUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and PHUN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and PHUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHUBF
1D Price
Change %
MHUBF100%
-2.27%
PHUN - MHUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
INTZ - MHUBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
OMCL - MHUBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
BKKT - MHUBF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.07%
KCRD - MHUBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-16.67%
More

OMCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMCL has been loosely correlated with FFIV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMCL jumps, then FFIV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMCL
1D Price
Change %
OMCL100%
-0.88%
FFIV - OMCL
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
RIOT - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
CLSK - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
HSTM - OMCL
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
COIN - OMCL
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
More