Ad is loading...
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$12.22
Change+$0.09 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. TRCLX (40M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (3.44) vs TRCLX (1.68). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (14 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.04). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (27.30). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.16 vs. TRCLX (4.00). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.29 vs. MICDX (-3.59).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.03 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.297 | -1.042 | -316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 40M | 235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 1.68 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.16 | 4.00 | 629% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | -11.64 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.59 | 2.29 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers