Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.37M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICDX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICDX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. TRCLX (66.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (2.87) vs TRCLX (1.34). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.34 vs. TRCLX (12.64). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : 2.02 vs. TRCLX (1.91).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.123 | 33.902 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 66.4M | 157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 1.34 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.34 | 12.64 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.55 | 34.85 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.02 | 1.91 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement