Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.71M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICDX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICDX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. TRCLX (61.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (2.93) vs TRCLX (1.34). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.30 vs. TRCLX (29.22). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -6.68 vs. TRCLX (-10.87).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.065 | 29.451 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 61.7M | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.34 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.30 | 29.22 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.64 | 29.11 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.68 | -10.87 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement