Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$13.73
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.61M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. TRCLX (50.6M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (3.37) vs TRCLX (1.61). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.36 vs. TRCLX (20.53). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.63 vs. MICDX (-7.39).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.768 | 14.015 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 50.6M | 179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 1.61 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.36 | 20.53 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | -0.32 | -2,284% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.39 | -5.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement