Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.76
Change+$0.18 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.06M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. TRCLX (53.1M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (3.18) vs TRCLX (1.56). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.84 vs. TRCLX (30.69). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.86 vs. MICDX (-6.54).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.394 | 19.129 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.7M | 53.1M | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 1.56 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.84 | 30.69 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.08 | 6.87 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.54 | -5.86 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement