Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$13.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. TRCLX (45M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (3.48) vs TRCLX (1.69). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.98 vs. TRCLX (5.49). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.31 vs. MICDX (-4.55).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.919 | 8.617 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 45M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 1.69 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.98 | 5.49 | 346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.10 | -5.40 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.55 | -1.31 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers