Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.35M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. TRCLX (62.3M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (2.99) vs TRCLX (1.39). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.10 vs. TRCLX (46.73). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. TRCLX (-2.43).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.410 | 28.977 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 62.3M | 160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 1.39 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.10 | 46.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 22.60 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | -2.43 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers