Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPIX vs MPACX
MIPIX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts MIPIX vs MPACX
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$16.20
Change+$0.16 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.54M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$25.03
Change+$0.31 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.27M
MIPIX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIPIX vs. MPACX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIPIX is a Buy and MPACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIPIX has more cash in the bank: 562M vs. MPACX (208M). MIPIX (2.20) and MPACX (2.14) have matching dividends . MIPIX was incepted earlier than MPACX: MIPIX (15 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than MIPIX (1.09). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. MIPIX (16.81). MPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: MPACX (2500) vs MIPIX (100000). MIPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.20 vs. MPACX (16.63). MIPIX return over 5 years is better than : -7.16 vs. MPACX (-16.09).
| MIPIX | MPACX | MIPIX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.25 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.25 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.252 | 10.406 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 208M | 270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 2.14 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.20 | 16.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.55 | 12.85 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.16 | -16.09 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.60 | 19.22 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement