Ad is loading...
MIPIX vs MPACX
MIPIX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts MIPIX vs MPACX
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$13.97
Change-$0.34 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.7M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$21.52
Change-$0.87 (-3.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.93M
MIPIX vs MPACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIPIX vs. MPACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIPIX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIPIX has more cash in the bank: 569M vs. MPACX (215M). MIPIX pays higher dividends than MPACX: MIPIX (2.56) vs MPACX (2.38). MIPIX was incepted earlier than MPACX: MIPIX (14 years) vs MPACX (21 years). MPACX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MIPIX (0.99). MPACX (77.32) and MIPIX (75.88) have comparable annual turnover. MPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: MPACX (2500) vs MIPIX (100000). MIPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. MPACX (1.11). MIPIX return over 5 years is better than : 12.62 vs. MPACX (2.88).
| MIPIX | MPACX | MIPIX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.13 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.13 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.835 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 215M | 265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.38 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 1.11 | 556% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.50 | -11.04 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.62 | 2.88 | 439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.88 | 3.89 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...