Ad is loading...
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$17.23
Change+$0.25 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.65M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$16.48
Change+$0.24 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.73B vs. MIPTX (694M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (3.29) vs TRZNX (2.26). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (14 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). MIPTX (0.99) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). TRZNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.80 vs. MIPTX (14.78). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. MIPTX (-3.86).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.83 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.905 | -1.814 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 694M | 1.73B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.26 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.86 | 6.93 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.99 | 4.12 | -510% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.89 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...