Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$21.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets702.82M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$20.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. MIPTX (703M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (2.83) vs TRZNX (1.98). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (15 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.56 vs. MIPTX (18.07).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.165 | 22.249 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 703M | 2.02B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.98 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.07 | 22.56 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.51 | 34.45 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.10 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement