Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$19.00
Change+$0.13 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.65M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$17.82
Change+$0.13 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. MIPTX (694M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (3.16) vs TRZNX (2.19). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (15 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. MIPTX (0.76).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.791 | 6.953 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 694M | 1.86B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.19 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 8.90 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.84 | 8.30 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.18 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement