Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$19.71
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets684.44M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.49
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. MIPTX (684M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (2.99) vs TRZNX (2.08). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (15 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. MIPTX (1.20).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.979 | 11.185 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 684M | 1.91B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 2.08 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 9.65 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.99 | 15.35 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.72 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers