It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MIR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOMZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MIR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOMZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MIR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while TOMZ (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +9.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.
MIR is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
TOMZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
MIR | TOMZ | MIR / TOMZ | |
Capitalization | 2.57B | 13.5M | 19,037% |
EBITDA | 119M | -2.37M | -5,021% |
Gain YTD | 77.171 | -21.931 | -352% |
P/E Ratio | 9.93 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 801M | 8.64M | 9,273% |
Total Cash | 134M | 1.41M | 9,497% |
Total Debt | 721M | 785K | 91,847% |
MIR | TOMZ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOMZ's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MIR (62). This means that TOMZ’s stock grew similarly to MIR’s over the last 12 months.
MIR's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOMZ (100). This means that MIR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
MIR's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as TOMZ (95). This means that MIR’s stock grew similarly to TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
MIR's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOMZ (81). This means that MIR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
MIR's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as TOMZ (94). This means that MIR’s stock grew similarly to TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
MIR | TOMZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 9 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago60% | 16 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 7 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIR has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MIR jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOMZ and BWEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOMZ and BWEN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOMZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TOMZ | 100% | +9.82% | ||
BWEN - TOMZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
KRNT - TOMZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
CSWI - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.98% | ||
MIR - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
ZWS - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
More |