Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWBX
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWBX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$13.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.89M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.59
Change-$0.47 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. MISFX (207M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MISFX (2.50) vs RNWBX (0.13). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MISFX (1.28). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWBX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. MISFX (4.57). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.25 vs. MISFX (16.53).
| MISFX | RNWBX | MISFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.67 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.67 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.484 | 15.010 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.13 | 1,956% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 8.23 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.74 | 38.23 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 23.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | 60.30 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement