Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWBX
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWBX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$14.41
Change+$0.09 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.09M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.43
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. MISFX (217M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MISFX (2.52) vs RNWBX (0.13). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MISFX (1.28). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWBX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.45 vs. MISFX (15.06). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.32 vs. MISFX (16.83).
| MISFX | RNWBX | MISFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.67 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.67 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.034 | 22.950 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 0.13 | 2,008% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 16.45 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.07 | 46.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | 27.32 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.37 | 90.27 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement