Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$12.87
Change-$0.22 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.11M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$86.26
Change-$0.96 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.4B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.4B vs. MISFX (204M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.55) vs RNWHX (1.00). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.34 vs. MISFX (8.31). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.25 vs. MISFX (15.65).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.723 | 13.470 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204M | 69.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.00 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 12.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 32.21 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 24.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement