Ad is loading...
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$12.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.93M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$80.42
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. MISFX (185M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.80) vs RNWHX (1.10). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). MISFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. MISFX (-3.66). RNWHX (37.43) and MISFX (35.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.760 | 5.788 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185M | 63.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.10 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.66 | 3.35 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | 27.01 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.81 | 37.43 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers