Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$13.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.89M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.87
Change-$0.48 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. MISFX (207M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.50) vs RNWHX (0.99). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. MISFX (4.57). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. MISFX (16.53).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.484 | 15.588 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.99 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 9.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.74 | 41.01 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 27.96 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement