Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$12.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.38M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.85
Change-$0.08 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.64B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. MISFX (201M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.69) vs RNWHX (1.04). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. MISFX (1.20). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.28 vs. MISFX (24.57).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.382 | 11.615 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 67.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 1.04 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 7.57 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.61 | 36.30 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.57 | 30.28 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement