Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$14.41
Change+$0.09 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.09M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.10
Change+$0.23 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. MISFX (217M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.52) vs RNWHX (0.97). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.66 vs. MISFX (15.06). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.18 vs. MISFX (16.83).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.034 | 23.783 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 0.97 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 17.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.07 | 49.13 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | 32.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers