Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISHX vs WFCMX
MISHX vs WFCMX Comparison
Open Charts MISHX vs WFCMX
Allspring Managed Acct CoreBuilder® M
Price$10.98
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.53M
MISHX vs WFCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISHX vs. WFCMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISHX is a Hold and WFCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MISHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. WFCMX (791M). MISHX (4.28) and WFCMX (4.11) have matching dividends . MISHX was incepted earlier than WFCMX: MISHX (15 years) vs WFCMX (17 years). MISHX (0.22) is less costly to investors than WFCMX (0.05). MISHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. WFCMX (9.00). MISHX (0) and WFCMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. MISHX (-0.00). MISHX return over 5 years is better than : 6.79 vs. WFCMX (5.06).
| MISHX | WFCMX | MISHX / WFCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.22 | 0.05 | 440% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.963 | 1.027 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 791M | 2,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 4.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.00 | 1.12 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.43 | 11.69 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.79 | 5.06 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.59 | 20.96 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement