MITK
Price
$7.65
Change
-$0.13 (-1.67%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
673.32M
12 days until earnings call
MKTDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
643.32K
Ad is loading...

MITK vs MKTDF

Header iconMITK vs MKTDF Comparison
Open Charts MITK vs MKTDFBanner chart's image
Mitek Systems
Price$7.65
Change-$0.13 (-1.67%)
Volume$428.37K
Capitalization673.32M
Deepmarkit
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization643.32K
MITK vs MKTDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MITK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MITK vs. MKTDF commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MITK is a Hold and MKTDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MITK: $7.65 vs. MKTDF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: MITK and MKTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MITK: 84% vs. MKTDF: 28%
Market capitalization -- MITK: $673.32M vs. MKTDF: $643.32K
MITK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $673.32M. MKTDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $643.32K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MITK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MITK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MITK and MKTDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MITK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MITK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MITK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while MKTDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

MITK is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MITK($673M) has a higher market cap than MKTDF($643K). MKTDF YTD gains are higher at: -26.444 vs. MITK (-31.267). MITK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29M vs. MKTDF (-8.48M). MITK has more cash in the bank: 61.9M vs. MKTDF (204K). MKTDF has less debt than MITK: MKTDF (40K) vs MITK (132M). MITK has higher revenues than MKTDF: MITK (132M) vs MKTDF (1.75K).
MITKMKTDFMITK / MKTDF
Capitalization673M643K104,666%
EBITDA29M-8.48M-342%
Gain YTD-31.267-26.444118%
P/E Ratio84.65N/A-
Revenue132M1.75K7,564,470%
Total Cash61.9M204K30,343%
Total Debt132M40K330,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MITK vs MKTDF: Fundamental Ratings
MITK
MKTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6393
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
8898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8288
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MITK's Valuation (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (77) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.

MITK's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.

MITK's SMR Rating (88) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (98) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.

MITK's Price Growth Rating (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (88) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.

MITK's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MITK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MITK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIESX15.360.27
+1.79%
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap I
DOMOX9.310.11
+1.20%
Domini Impact International Equity Instl
RYDVX5.450.04
+0.74%
Royce Dividend Value Svc
JGVRX35.820.09
+0.25%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R5
LCGFX24.80-0.24
-0.96%
William Blair Large Cap Growth I

MITK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITK has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITK jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITK
1D Price
Change %
MITK100%
-1.67%
PUBM - MITK
56%
Loosely correlated
+12.16%
FIVN - MITK
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
TLS - MITK
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
NRDY - MITK
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CLSK - MITK
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
More

MKTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKTDF and CCLD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKTDF and CCLD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTDF
1D Price
Change %
MKTDF100%
N/A
CCLD - MKTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
GUNGF - MKTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMTO - MKTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-35.81%
MITK - MKTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
SMWB - MKTDF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More