It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MITK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MITK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKTDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
MITK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.76% price change this week, while MKTDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.25%.
MITK is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
MITK | MKTDF | MITK / MKTDF | |
Capitalization | 673M | 643K | 104,666% |
EBITDA | 29M | -8.48M | -342% |
Gain YTD | -12.193 | -7.710 | 158% |
P/E Ratio | 84.65 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 132M | 1.75K | 7,564,470% |
Total Cash | 61.9M | 204K | 30,343% |
Total Debt | 132M | 40K | 330,000% |
MITK | MKTDF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKTDF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as MITK (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MKTDF’s stock grew similarly to MITK’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's SMR Rating (88) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MKTDF (64) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that MITK’s stock grew significantly faster than MKTDF’s over the last 12 months.
MITK | MKTDF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago77% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago71% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago48% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RYCOX | 58.76 | 0.78 | +1.35% |
Rydex NASDAQ-100® C | |||
PLSAX | 29.07 | 0.31 | +1.08% |
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index A | |||
STCZX | 16.29 | 0.16 | +0.99% |
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6 | |||
IPFCX | 28.06 | 0.14 | +0.50% |
Poplar Forest Cornerstone Investor | |||
FCIWX | 16.42 | -0.02 | -0.12% |
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITK has been loosely correlated with FIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITK jumps, then FIVN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MITK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MITK | 100% | +1.69% | ||
FIVN - MITK | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
PUBM - MITK | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
TLS - MITK | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
NRDY - MITK | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CLSK - MITK | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MKTDF and CCLD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKTDF and CCLD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKTDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MKTDF | 100% | N/A | ||
CCLD - MKTDF | 26% Poorly correlated | +6.76% | ||
GUNGF - MKTDF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BCAN - MKTDF | 21% Poorly correlated | +8.71% | ||
MITK - MKTDF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
SMWB - MKTDF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
More |