MITQ
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.04 (-5.88%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.99M
OKIEF
Price
$6.67
Change
+$0.20 (+3.10%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
551.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MITQ vs OKIEF

Header iconMITQ vs OKIEF Comparison
Open Charts MITQ vs OKIEFBanner chart's image
Moving iMage Technologies
Price$0.64
Change-$0.04 (-5.88%)
Volume$116.95K
Capitalization4.99M
OKI Electric Industry
Price$6.67
Change+$0.20 (+3.10%)
Volume$668
Capitalization551.94M
MITQ vs OKIEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MITQ vs. OKIEF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MITQ is a Hold and OKIEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MITQ: $0.64 vs. OKIEF: $6.66)
Brand notoriety: MITQ and OKIEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MITQ: 3% vs. OKIEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MITQ: $4.99M vs. OKIEF: $551.94M
MITQ [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $4.99M. OKIEF’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $551.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MITQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOKIEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MITQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OKIEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OKIEF is a better buy in the long-term than MITQ.

Price Growth

MITQ (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -25.13% price change this week, while OKIEF (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MITQ is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+5.01% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OKIEF($552M) has a higher market cap than MITQ($4.99M). OKIEF YTD gains are higher at: 0.985 vs. MITQ (-2.092). OKIEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7B vs. MITQ (-909K). OKIEF has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. MITQ (5.14M). MITQ has less debt than OKIEF: MITQ (296K) vs OKIEF (120B). OKIEF has higher revenues than MITQ: OKIEF (362B) vs MITQ (19.4M).
MITQOKIEFMITQ / OKIEF
Capitalization4.99M552M1%
EBITDA-909K13.7B-0%
Gain YTD-2.0920.985-212%
P/E RatioN/A21.32-
Revenue19.4M362B0%
Total Cash5.14M33B0%
Total Debt296K120B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OKIEF: Fundamental Ratings
OKIEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXJVX10.000.09
+0.91%
Empower International Value Instl
FDETX26.790.20
+0.75%
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development O
SGQCX41.780.29
+0.70%
DWS International Growth C
GPEOX12.720.04
+0.32%
Grandeur Peak Emerg Mkts Opps Inv
UIVVX12.530.03
+0.24%
MFS Intrinsic Value A

MITQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MITQ and ASNS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MITQ and ASNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITQ
1D Price
Change %
MITQ100%
-6.96%
ASNS - MITQ
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
BOXL - MITQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
CMBM - MITQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
CMTL - MITQ
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
AAOI - MITQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OKIEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OKIEF and MLRT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OKIEF and MLRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OKIEF
1D Price
Change %
OKIEF100%
N/A
MLRT - OKIEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.21%
MOYFF - OKIEF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITQ - OKIEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.96%
SYTA - OKIEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+13.79%
VMNT - OKIEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+26.96%
More