MIUFY
Price
$14.91
Change
+$0.30 (+2.05%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
11.81B
PRAA
Price
$16.20
Change
-$0.31 (-1.88%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
632.99M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MIUFY vs PRAA

Header iconMIUFY vs PRAA Comparison
Open Charts MIUFY vs PRAABanner chart's image
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$14.91
Change+$0.30 (+2.05%)
Volume$165
Capitalization11.81B
PRA Group
Price$16.20
Change-$0.31 (-1.88%)
Volume$373.63K
Capitalization632.99M
MIUFY vs PRAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MIUFY vs. PRAA commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIUFY is a StrongBuy and PRAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MIUFY: $14.91 vs. PRAA: $16.20)
Brand notoriety: MIUFY and PRAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MIUFY: 57% vs. PRAA: 96%
Market capitalization -- MIUFY: $11.81B vs. PRAA: $632.99M
MIUFY [@Savings Banks] is valued at $11.81B. PRAA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $632.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MIUFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRAA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the long-term than PRAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MIUFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PRAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRAA is a better buy in the short-term than MIUFY.

Price Growth

MIUFY (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRAA (@Savings Banks) price change was +5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRAA is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.49% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($11.8B) has a higher market cap than PRAA($633M). MIUFY has higher P/E ratio than PRAA: MIUFY (11.67) vs PRAA (7.12). MIUFY YTD gains are higher at: 20.729 vs. PRAA (-22.451). MIUFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 576B vs. PRAA (216M). MIUFY has more cash in the bank: 385B vs. PRAA (189M). PRAA has less debt than MIUFY: PRAA (3.5B) vs MIUFY (7.99T). MIUFY has higher revenues than PRAA: MIUFY (2.08T) vs PRAA (1.14B).
MIUFYPRAAMIUFY / PRAA
Capitalization11.8B633M1,864%
EBITDA576B216M266,667%
Gain YTD20.729-22.451-92%
P/E Ratio11.677.12164%
Revenue2.08T1.14B182,601%
Total Cash385B189M203,704%
Total Debt7.99T3.5B228,453%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY vs PRAA: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
PRAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3157
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
10080
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRAA's Valuation (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as MIUFY (63) in the null industry. This means that PRAA’s stock grew similarly to MIUFY’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRAA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MIUFY’s stock grew significantly faster than PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

PRAA's SMR Rating (80) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as MIUFY (100) in the null industry. This means that PRAA’s stock grew similarly to MIUFY’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PRAA (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MIUFY’s stock grew similarly to PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRAA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MIUFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MIUFYPRAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLQAX13.79N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity A
JLVIX74.82N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core I
DGIFX25.63N/A
N/A
Disciplined Growth Investors
PGRUX9.62N/A
N/A
Principal Global Real Estate Sec R5
CUSCX11.73-0.07
-0.59%
Cullen Small Cap Value C

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTZ - MIUFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
WLFC - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
EHMEF - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRAA - MIUFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
More

PRAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRAA has been loosely correlated with ECPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRAA jumps, then ECPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRAA
1D Price
Change %
PRAA100%
-1.88%
ECPG - PRAA
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
OMF - PRAA
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
AGM - PRAA
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
UHAL - PRAA
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
SYF - PRAA
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More