MJDLF
Price
$8.59
Change
-$0.06 (-0.69%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
693.29M
NMG
Price
$2.81
Change
+$0.11 (+4.07%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
426.77M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJDLF vs NMG

Header iconMJDLF vs NMG Comparison
Open Charts MJDLF vs NMGBanner chart's image
Major Drilling Group International
Price$8.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.69%)
Volume$12.01K
Capitalization693.29M
Nouveau Monde Graphite
Price$2.81
Change+$0.11 (+4.07%)
Volume$211.17K
Capitalization426.77M
MJDLF vs NMG Comparison Chart in %
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJDLF vs. NMG commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJDLF is a Buy and NMG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MJDLF: $8.59 vs. NMG: $2.81)
Brand notoriety: MJDLF and NMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJDLF: 22% vs. NMG: 182%
Market capitalization -- MJDLF: $693.29M vs. NMG: $426.77M
MJDLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $693.29M. NMG’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $426.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJDLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than NMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJDLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MJDLF and NMG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while NMG (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +249.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.35% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJDLF($693M) has a higher market cap than NMG($427M). NMG YTD gains are higher at: 76.730 vs. MJDLF (51.767). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. NMG (-53.18M). NMG has more cash in the bank: 73.5M vs. MJDLF (46M). NMG has less debt than MJDLF: NMG (18.6M) vs MJDLF (37.1M). MJDLF has higher revenues than NMG: MJDLF (728M) vs NMG (0).
MJDLFNMGMJDLF / NMG
Capitalization693M427M162%
EBITDA103M-53.18M-194%
Gain YTD51.76776.73067%
P/E Ratio47.85N/A-
Revenue728M0-
Total Cash46M73.5M63%
Total Debt37.1M18.6M199%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJDLF vs NMG: Fundamental Ratings
MJDLF
NMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5692
SMR RATING
1..100
8597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMG's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (82). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMG (92). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMG’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (97). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (40). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMG (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than NMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJDLFNMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSSVX10.910.08
+0.74%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Special Val
ACVRX11.140.07
+0.63%
American Century International Val R
OFAVX27.920.17
+0.61%
Olstein All Cap Value A
PRRCX12.780.03
+0.24%
Victory Pioneer Equ Premium Income C
FZALX30.130.03
+0.10%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Z

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
TECK - MJDLF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
BHP - MJDLF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
GSM - MJDLF
40%
Loosely correlated
+11.01%
FSUGY - MJDLF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More

NMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMG and TOEYF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMG and TOEYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMG
1D Price
Change %
NMG100%
+4.07%
TOEYF - NMG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAR - NMG
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.02%
LGO - NMG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
TECK - NMG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
MJDLF - NMG
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More