MJGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
108.96M
PMDRF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJGCF vs PMDRF

Header iconMJGCF vs PMDRF Comparison
Open Charts MJGCF vs PMDRFBanner chart's image
Majestic Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization108.96M
BRASNOVA ENERGY MATLS
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization4.31M
MJGCF vs PMDRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJGCF vs. PMDRF commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJGCF is a Hold and PMDRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (MJGCF: $0.11 vs. PMDRF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: MJGCF and PMDRF are both not notable
MJGCF represents the Precious Metals, while PMDRF is part of the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJGCF: 16% vs. PMDRF: 17%
Market capitalization -- MJGCF: $108.96M vs. PMDRF: $4.31M
MJGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $108.96M. PMDRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $77.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.52B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJGCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMDRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the long-term than PMDRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJGCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMDRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PMDRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the short-term than PMDRF.

Price Growth

MJGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.21% price change this week, while PMDRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4073.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +11.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.03% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Other Metals/Minerals (+11.01% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJGCF($109M) has a higher market cap than PMDRF($4.31M). MJGCF YTD gains are higher at: 102.430 vs. PMDRF (75.826). MJGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42M vs. PMDRF (-1.89M). MJGCF has more cash in the bank: 23.8M vs. PMDRF (21.2K). PMDRF has less debt than MJGCF: PMDRF (1.61M) vs MJGCF (16.9M). MJGCF has higher revenues than PMDRF: MJGCF (74.9M) vs PMDRF (0).
MJGCFPMDRFMJGCF / PMDRF
Capitalization109M4.31M2,527%
EBITDA42M-1.89M-2,226%
Gain YTD102.43075.826135%
P/E Ratio10.91N/A-
Revenue74.9M0-
Total Cash23.8M21.2K112,264%
Total Debt16.9M1.61M1,050%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJGCF: Fundamental Ratings
MJGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJGCFPMDRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOUT10.280.75
+7.87%
American Outdoor Brands
MTR5.550.34
+6.53%
Mesa Royalty Trust
COLM56.522.96
+5.53%
Columbia Sportswear Company
SIGA9.130.38
+4.34%
SIGA Technologies
DVN35.161.27
+3.75%
Devon Energy Corp

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
+8.51%
PMDRF - MJGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMRFF - MJGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
VIORF - MJGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMRGF - MJGCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.91%
MNDJF - MJGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMDRF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMDRF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMDRF
1D Price
Change %
PMDRF100%
N/A
VITFF - PMDRF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MJGCF - PMDRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.51%
BYAGF - PMDRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
CBGZF - PMDRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.86%
IMRFF - PMDRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
More