MKC vs SENEA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKC is a Hold and SENEA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MKC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MKC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MKC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MKC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SENEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MKC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while SENEA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
MKC is expected to report earnings on Jun 26, 2025.
SENEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.85% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| MKC | SENEA | MKC / SENEA | |
| Capitalization | 20.6B | 404M | 5,099% |
| EBITDA | 1.24B | 145M | 854% |
| Gain YTD | 0.368 | 11.658 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.24 | 7.41 | 395% |
| Revenue | 6.7B | 1.48B | 452% |
| Total Cash | 178M | 7.17M | 2,483% |
| Total Debt | 4.46B | 669M | 666% |
MKC | SENEA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKC's Valuation (46) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (75). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.
SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKC (81). This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.
MKC's SMR Rating (55) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (78). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.
SENEA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (52). This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.
SENEA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKC (62). This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.
| MKC | SENEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 12 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 4 days ago 72% |
MKC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKC has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKC jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.
SENEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEA and FLO have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEA and FLO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEA | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| FLO - SENEA | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
| LANC - SENEA | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
| UTZ - SENEA | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| JJSF - SENEA | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| JBSS - SENEA | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||