Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBAX
MKCPX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBAX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$27.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
MKCPX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MKCPX (1.7B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MKCPX (2.68) vs RLBAX (1.08). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MKCPX (0.48). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBAX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. MKCPX (4.73). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. MKCPX (19.56).
| MKCPX | RLBAX | MKCPX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.31 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.31 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.019 | 13.298 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.08 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 8.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.84 | 38.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.56 | 34.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement