Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBAX
MKCPX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBAX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$27.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
MKCPX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. MKCPX (1.72B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MKCPX (2.70) vs RLBAX (1.10). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MKCPX (0.48). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBAX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. MKCPX (4.34). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. MKCPX (22.02).
| MKCPX | RLBAX | MKCPX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.31 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.31 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 13.947 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 1.10 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | 7.84 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.96 | 47.39 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.02 | 37.69 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement