Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$26.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. MKDCX (2.43B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (1.74) vs RNWBX (0.13). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.85). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. MKDCX (3.39). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.16 vs. MKDCX (11.24).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.012 | 15.337 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 70.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 0.13 | 1,362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 8.48 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.86 | 38.04 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | 24.16 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers