Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$25.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. MKDCX (2.7B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (1.86) vs RNWBX (0.13). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.85). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. MKDCX (3.21). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. MKDCX (10.27).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.258 | 10.918 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 67.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.13 | 1,383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 6.60 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 21.12 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.27 | 24.82 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers