Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$29.43
Change-$0.28 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. MKDCX (2.18B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (1.54) vs RNWBX (0.12). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.85). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). MKDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.50 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. MKDCX (17.96).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.377 | 23.671 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 75.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.12 | 1,281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 11.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.85 | 54.43 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 25.41 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers