MKFG
Price
$4.74
Change
-$0.02 (-0.42%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
170.25M
TACT
Price
$3.70
Change
-$0.10 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.82M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKFG vs TACT

Header iconMKFG vs TACT Comparison
Open Charts MKFG vs TACTBanner chart's image
Markforged Holding
Price$4.74
Change-$0.02 (-0.42%)
Volume$318.22K
Capitalization170.25M
TransAct Technologies
Price$3.70
Change-$0.10 (-2.63%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization49.82M
MKFG vs TACT Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKFG vs. TACT commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKFG is a StrongBuy and TACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (MKFG: $4.74 vs. TACT: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: MKFG and TACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKFG: 110% vs. TACT: 90%
Market capitalization -- MKFG: $170.25M vs. TACT: $49.82M
MKFG [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $170.25M. TACT’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $49.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $262.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $9.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTACT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MKFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TACT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKFG is a better buy in the long-term than TACT.

Price Growth

MKFG (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TACT (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

MKFG is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

TACT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (-0.11% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKFG($170M) has a higher market cap than TACT($49.8M). TACT (10.64) and MKFG (10.42) have similar P/E ratio . MKFG YTD gains are higher at: 50.955 vs. TACT (-7.090). TACT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.7M vs. MKFG (-91.11M). MKFG has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. TACT (12.3M). TACT has less debt than MKFG: TACT (3.9M) vs MKFG (43.1M). MKFG has higher revenues than TACT: MKFG (93.8M) vs TACT (72.6M).
MKFGTACTMKFG / TACT
Capitalization170M49.8M341%
EBITDA-91.11M7.7M-1,183%
Gain YTD50.955-7.090-719%
P/E Ratio10.4210.6498%
Revenue93.8M72.6M129%
Total Cash117M12.3M951%
Total Debt43.1M3.9M1,105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TACT: Fundamental Ratings
TACT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDAY247.715.95
+2.46%
Workday
NWBI12.28-0.07
-0.57%
Northwest Bancshares
NSIT130.39-1.77
-1.34%
Insight Enterprises
CAN0.61-0.03
-3.95%
Canaan
KSCP5.58-0.24
-4.12%
Knightscope Inc

MKFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKFG and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKFG and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKFG
1D Price
Change %
MKFG100%
N/A
SMCI - MKFG
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
CRSR - MKFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
NNDM - MKFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
LOGI - MKFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
DDD - MKFG
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
More

TACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TACT and IONQ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TACT and IONQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TACT
1D Price
Change %
TACT100%
-1.30%
IONQ - TACT
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.62%
VLDX - TACT
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.60%
MKFG - TACT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSTG - TACT
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
WDC - TACT
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
More