MKGAF
Price
$134.65
Change
-$2.35 (-1.72%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
76.59B
MVMDF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKGAF vs MVMDF

Header iconMKGAF vs MVMDF Comparison
Open Charts MKGAF vs MVMDFBanner chart's image
Merck KGaA
Price$134.65
Change-$2.35 (-1.72%)
Volume$547
Capitalization76.59B
Mountain Valley MD Holdings
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.8K
Capitalization11.46M
MKGAF vs MVMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MVMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKGAF vs. MVMDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKGAF is a StrongBuy and MVMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MKGAF: $134.65 vs. MVMDF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: MKGAF and MVMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKGAF: 33% vs. MVMDF: 27%
Market capitalization -- MKGAF: $76.59B vs. MVMDF: $11.46M
MKGAF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $76.59B. MVMDF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $11.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKGAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMVMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MKGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MVMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKGAF is a better buy in the long-term than MVMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MKGAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MVMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MKGAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MVMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKGAF is a better buy in the short-term than MVMDF.

Price Growth

MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +3.26% price change this week, while MVMDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +7.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +75.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.53% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKGAF($76.6B) has a higher market cap than MVMDF($11.5M). MKGAF YTD gains are higher at: -11.157 vs. MVMDF (-12.919). MKGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.45B vs. MVMDF (-5.94M). MKGAF has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. MVMDF (10.9M). MVMDF has less debt than MKGAF: MVMDF (14K) vs MKGAF (10.6B). MKGAF has higher revenues than MVMDF: MKGAF (22.3B) vs MVMDF (110K).
MKGAFMVMDFMKGAF / MVMDF
Capitalization76.6B11.5M666,087%
EBITDA6.45B-5.94M-108,676%
Gain YTD-11.157-12.91986%
P/E Ratio20.96N/A-
Revenue22.3B110K20,272,727%
Total Cash1.72B10.9M15,789%
Total Debt10.6B14K75,714,286%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKGAF vs MVMDF: Fundamental Ratings
MKGAF
MVMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
793
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
6996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1628

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MKGAF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVMDF (90). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MVMDF (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MVMDF (96). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MVMDF (84). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MVMDF (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MKGAFMVMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MVMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEGG34.313.60
+11.72%
Newegg Commerce Inc
NIU3.850.12
+3.22%
Niu Technologies
CSL435.115.57
+1.30%
Carlisle Companies
BGLC4.900.02
+0.41%
Bionexus Gene Lab Corp
BRC70.07-0.24
-0.34%
Brady Corp

MKGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKGAF has been loosely correlated with MKKGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKGAF jumps, then MKKGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKGAF
1D Price
Change %
MKGAF100%
-1.72%
MKKGY - MKGAF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
AQST - MKGAF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
INDV - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
EVO - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
EBS - MKGAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
More